Monday, July 31, 2006

Hagar Is Responsible For Today's Problems In The Middle East



From the Letters section of the Quad City Times:
Probably, the problems in the Middle East have escalated from the time of the Old Testament’s “Genesis” when Hagar, Sarah’s maid, gave birth to Ishmael, and fourteen years later, Sarah gave birth to Isaac. Abraham sired both boys. So, maybe the “Hagars” and the “Sarahs” of Asia should be permitted to meet in some type of a koffee-klotch round-table discussion and solve their ego-rotting revengefulness.

Arlene Jens, Davenport

Newspapers Not Niggardly With Romney "Tar Baby" Coverage

It's hard to believe the difference between the uproar over Mass Gov Mitt Romney using the phrase "tar baby" to describe the Big Dig Mess at the Republican Party of Iowa's Chairman's Dinner in Cedar Rapids over the weekend and, say, Mel Gibson getting caught for speeding and drunk driving, then yelling at the arresting police officers about the "Fucking Jews", and then the AP and newspapers like the Waterloo Courier reprinting Gibson's publicist's whitewashed statement.

If it wasn't for the internet, especially Matt Drudge, the Mel "Fucking Jews" Gibson thing wouldn't have registered on the radar.

As for the phrase tar baby, I'd like to find a single newspaper article that fully explains what is so racist about the term. The reporters, who know what it means, always run to some black race pimp to get a superficial quote. It's not unlike those who complain when somebody utters the word niggardly in public.

From Random House:
The tar baby is a form of a character widespread in African folklore. In various folktales, gum, wax, or other sticky material is used to trap a person.

The folktale achieved currency in the United States in written form in one of Joel Chandler Harris's Uncle Remus stories, a collection of stories based on African-American folklore, narrated by the fictional Uncle Remus, a former slave. In the story "Tar-Baby," the character Brer Fox makes a doll out of tar, which he places by the road to entrap his enemy Brer Rabbit. Brer Rabbit talks to the doll, and when it doesn't answer, he hits it, and gets stuck in the tar. The more he struggles with it, the more he is entangled in it.
The entry at Random House goes on to say that it has been used as a derogatory term for black people, but doesn't put this use into context.

I don't really care for Mitt Romney, that special underwear-wearing Mormon, but I'll stick up for him in this instance. Romney's obviously not a racist, but some people trying to make political hay out of this issue sure come off as ignorant fools. Most everybody complaining about Romney are Democrats, anyway, yet these same Democrats don't mind having a former KKK member and Kleagle as their senior Senator from West Virginee.

Jew Haters In Iowa Get Back On Their Soapbox, Part 3



From Dr Maureen McCue, coordinator of the Iowa Chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility, and printed in the Iowa City Press-Citizen:
In the tit-for-tat counting of rockets launched into and out of Israel, the number killed in each locale, and the discussion of the rights of a nation to defend itself against terrorism, we tend to think there is a level playing field, equal riskand no important history between the involved combatants and unfortu-nate victims. There is no acknowledgment of the intense suffering of Palestinians, especially those in Gaza, nor of the overwhelming military capability, including an arsenal of nuclear weapons, of the Israeli defense force.

We are continuously reminded about the role of Iran and Syria in supplying military personnel and hardware to Hezbollah and Hamas. Yet there is no acknowledgment or debate about the massive amount of military aid that flows from the U.S. into Israel.
This is just another spin of the "disproportionate violence" talking point that the Jew-haters have been using for the past couple of weeks.

Also spun is the "moral equivalence" angle, by somehow equating the United States with Iran and Syria.

It's probably difficult to explain to Dr McCue, but Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah have an expressed goal of killing Jews and eradicating the State of Israel. The United States and Israel are not advocating the killing of anybody, except Muslim terrorist assholes bent on executing another Holocaust of the Jews.

What is it with the Iowa City Press-Citizen? Why do they keep printing this anti-Semitic drivel? Maybe they hate the Fucking Jews, too, just like that drunk driving Mel Gibson.

Rock In Prevention: The Corrupt ISU Internal Review Board

From the Des Moines Register by reporter Clark Kauffman:
Iowa State University officials say there is no evidence to support "any allegations of improprieties" pertaining to the university's study of Rock In Prevention...
I really could quote the entire article, so read the whole thing yourself.

Whoever is on the Internal Review Board at ISU deserves an internal review up their ass with the $795,000 electron microscope that ISU is buying.

So who's on the ISU Internal Review Board? Good luck finding that information out. It doesn't seem to be on the ISU web site. There's an Internal Audit group, but no names are given.

And:
Spokesman John McCarroll said the detailed findings of the report will not be made public because they relate to "personnel" information.
Nice job of trying to bury this, ISU, by making it "classified" via HR.

Somebody is dirty at ISU, that's for sure. Either that, or they're trying to cover up a gigantic fuckup on the university's part.

Keep digging, Clark Kauffman. How about finding out who's on the Internal Review Board and splashing their names around? Be relentless. There's got to be a "FOL" (Friend Of Lameberti) in there somewhere.


History: Rock In Prevention scandal

Sunday, July 30, 2006

Clark "Spinner" McLeod, The Broadbandit, Pays $4.4 Million Fine



From CBS News, via the AP:
Clark McLeod, who had been chairman and chief executive of McLeodUSA, agreed to turn over $4.4 million in profits he was accused of receiving from the so-called act of "spinning," Attorney General Eliot Spitzer said. The deal was to be formally announced on Monday.

The former executive was accused of directing more than $77 million of McLeodUSA's investment banking business to Salomon Smith Barney. In exchange, the company "secretly" gave McLeod shares of 34 stocks before its initial public offering, which resulted in a windfall of $4.8 million on the first day of public trading of the stock, according to Spitzer's 2002 civil lawsuit.

There was no finding or admission of liability in the settlement, which dismisses Spitzer's action against McLeod.
Funny how this article doesn't mention the dirtiest bastard of all, Salomon Smith Barney's Jack Grubman, the Worst Analyst Ever.

Grubman was on the take, along with all those other filthy and dirty telecom CEOs in the late 1990s: Bernard Ebbers of WorldCom, Philip Anschutz and Joseph Nacchio of Qwest Communications, and Stephen Garofalo of Metromedia Fiber Networks. Grubman had a "buy" rating on McLeod USA stock until the company filed for it's initial bankruptcy in January 2002.

And despite Clark "Broadbandit" McLeod being dirty and crooked, that didn't stop bi-partisan support (Terry Braindead, Bonnie Campbell, and Bob "Filthy" Ray) of McLeod's latest scam of forcing taxpayers to go on the hook for municipal broadband utilities in various communities throughout Iowa.

Greed is good, eh, Clarkie?


Related: Who Are The Real Fat Cats?

Bringing The Top Porn Stars To The Quad Cities

From the Quad City Times web site, an ad for the Amsterdam Gentleman's Club.

You get a free XXX DVD with any club admission. And Saturday night is the Ultimate Bachelor Party Night.

Ultimate?

More CIETC Scandal, If That's Possible


GED recipient and former $360,000-a-year CIETC head Ramona Cunningham with Senator Tom Harkin at the dedication of the "Tom Harkin Learning Center" at CIETC offices in October 20, 2004.

Clark Kauffmann and Jason Clayworth have a story in the Sunday Des Moines Register about how Polk County taxpayer dollars meant for job training programs ended up as bonus padding for members of the inbred Southside Des Moines political Mafia, also known as the Polk County Democrats.

Archie Brooks, the civic thug, a civic extortionist, and a guy who has a tendency to lie and blame things on his stroke, attempts to say that the signature used to sign off on the bonuses is a fake.

The Register reproduces Brooks' real signature and the "fake" one as evidence. They look basically the same. Maybe Archie Brooks wasn't using the rubber stamp provided by fellow Des Moines City Councilman Tom "Rubber Stamp" Vlassis?

Considering the way that CIETC spending was approved without looking at the bills, it wouldn't surprise me if somebody signed on Brooks' behalf but with his approval.

Archie Brooks is so dirty. Does he think anybody is going to believe him, even if the signature isn't really his? It doesn't matter either way. The time is coming when Des Moines voters are going to head to the polls to finally flush these thugs and greaseballs into the sewer where they belong. Perhaps Brooks will end up in his rightful destination: Anamosa or Fort Madison.

Saturday, July 29, 2006

Jew Haters In Iowa Get Back On Their Soapbox, Part 2



Like a drunk driving Mel Gibson, it's always curious to see all the Jew-haters voice their true opinions. Here's Dennis Olson of Long Grove, writing to the Quad City Times:
History repeats itself. The phrase is sickening when used in the context of the Middle East.

Violence begets violence, and when Israel is involved it typically escalates. I, for one, am sick of the repeated disproportionate violence unleashed by the Israeli military. Last week it happened again. A handful of terrorists kidnapped three Israeli soldiers. It escalates and scores are killed at a disproportionate rate, probably 10 to 1 Arab to Israeli, mostly innocent civilians.

Of course, there will be a multitude who will say “they have the right to defend themselves.” That, of course, is true, but even a casual observer can see that time and again Israel responds with force that victimizes the innocent.

There are options. Diplomacy, along with small covert military actions would have been more appropriate and more effective at returning their troops. The actions taken, I suspect, were not intended to secure the captured troops. Rather, they were intended to punish and intimidate their Arab neighbors, thus perpetuating further hatred and violence.

I cannot remain silent. The media and our politicians are reluctant to speak for fear of being called anti-Semitic. We cannot however, in the name of justice and peace, condone this disproportionate violence. After all, the old Jewish texts tell us, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” As a world leader, we must demand and demonstrate restraint.
This time, the anti-Semites use the talking point of "disproportionate violence" to describe Israel defending itself against a terrorist group, Hezbollah, dedicated to killing Jews and eradicating the State of Israel. They are funded by terrorist regimes in Syria and Iran, as are the missles that Hezbollah launches indiscriminately into Israel. The Jew-haters like Dennis Olson never mention that, do they? No, they don't.


Related: Jew Haters In Iowa Get Back On Their Soapbox

Iowa Board Of Parole Likes To Beat Up Battered Women


Dixie Shanahan (now Dixie Duty), after her husband beat her up

From the Des Moines Register:
Board members asked Duty, who was convicted of second-degree murder, why she passed on an offer to plead guilty to significantly lesser charges. Duty said she was ignorant of the court system and was unclear about her options.

"You were offered the deal of a lifetime," said parole board member Barbara Binnie. "In four and a half years, you would have been out and a free woman. But you did not do that because you felt you could get away with something."
Rude there, Mrs Ian Binnie.

Officials were incredulous that Duty had left Shanahan's body undisturbed for more than a year until sheriff's deputies made their grisly discovery at the couple's house.

"On your application for clemency, you said, 'I did what any reasonable person would have done.' You know, no reasonable person would leave a body rotting for 14 months in their bedroom," said the board's chairwoman, Elizabeth Robinson. "How cruel can it be to let a father rot in the same house with his children?"
When you've been repeatedly beaten up, had guns pointed at you, and told that you will abort the baby that you're carrying and then you're punched in the stomach, perhaps you're not in the most reasonable state of mind. Huh, Elizabeth Robinson?

By the way, Elizabeth Robinson supported Vilsack's blanket restoration of citizenship/voting rights for felons in Iowa.

Board member Karen Muelhaupt said she had "no doubt" that Shanahan had been "horrifically abusive." But she agreed that his killing was unjustified under the circumstances, and encouraged Duty to participate in prison programs that would help her cope with the trauma.
Unjustified under the circumstances?

Karen Muelhaupt received a Crime Victim Service Award in 1997 for being "a compassionate and pioneering advocate for crime victims for more than a decade" and her nominator wrote, "Karen embodies the spirit, conviction and energy of the crime victims movement."

Let's see how "unjustified under the circumstances" this is:
At trial, Dixie explained her relationship with Scott at the end of August 2002 was “[v]ery, very rocky” and she was being “[v]ery badly” abused by him three to four times a week. She said when she found out she was pregnant with Brittany, Scott “went ballistic” and told her to have an abortion. She refused. She testified they fought for several days, with Scott beating Dixie. During the beatings, Scott would tell her he would make sure she would not have the baby and there was nothing she could do about it.

She went on to testify that on August 30, 2002, Dixie woke up around 6:30 a.m. and woke her children. She sent Zachary to school before Scott awoke. When Scott woke up, he became enraged because Dixie did not wake him before Zachary left. She stated he then pulled Dixie by the hair and beat her in the stomach, hollering he was going to kill the unborn baby one way or another. At this point, Dixie sent Ashley to a friend’s house nearby. Dixie testified as she tried to leave, Scott followed her, took the car keys from her, and prevented her from leaving. He then knocked her on the ground, dragged her by her hair back into the house, and punched her in the stomach saying, “I’m gonna kill this baby. You’re not having this baby.”

Dixie said while she laid there crying, Scott went into the other room and came back with the shotgun. She said he was in a rage, physically shaking, and calling her names. He put two different shells in the gun and pointed the gun at her. He threatened her by saying, “This day is not over yet. I will kill you.” He then walked away. As she sat in the living room chair, he came back in a rage and beat her again, threatening her and the unborn baby’s lives.

Scott took all of the telephones out of the telephone jacks except the one in the bedroom. He took the telephones with him into the bedroom, where he laid down. Dixie thought the telephone in the bedroom was still working. Despite being dressed and sitting in a chair right by the door with nobody around, Dixie decided to call the police instead of leaving the house. She went into the bedroom to get the telephone. She said Scott was awake lying in bed on his side. As Dixie entered the bedroom to get the telephone, she saw Scott make a movement at her or the gun sitting beside the telephone. Dixie said she saw the gun, grabbed it, pointed it at Scott, closed her eyes, and shot him in the back of the head. She claimed she needed to protect herself and did not have any other choice but to fire the gun.

Dixie said she set the gun down, walked out of the bedroom, and sat in a chair for a couple of hours. She described herself as “[v]ery upset,” thinking about what she did and what she was going to do. Still unsure about what she was going to do, Dixie went back into the bedroom, pulled up the sheets to cover the body, retrieved the telephone and the gun, shut the bedroom door, and put a towel underneath it. She put the gun in the children’s bedroom closet.

Dixie never did anything else with Scott’s body and never told anyone what happened. She and her children continued to live in the house trying to live a normal life. She told people lies about Scott so she could avoid going to jail. She said she went into the bedroom three times after the shooting, all in the same day. She said at the time of the shooting the windows were open in the house, but she was able to close the bedroom window from the outside.
Dixie Shanahan's main crime seems to be that she didn't call the police after it happened because she was physically abused and mentally fucked up.

Her current crime seems to be that she didn't take a deal that would have put her away for only 4 years.

Considering Scott Shanahan's reputation, history of violence, and Dixie's physical and mental condition at the time of the shooting, no jury would have convicted her if she had called the cops after she shot him. At worst, she probably would have been pitied, sent to a mental institution for a few months, had her baby, and gone back to her sad existence, but at least with a second chance at a better life.

Yes, yes, yes, she drained Scott Shanahan's account, wrote some bad checks, and sold his stuff, but it wasn't very much money. And, in a way, it was probably a survival mechanism. I'm not saying it's right, but it's not like she killed him for his money. That should be obvious.

I hope that Tom Vilsack grants Dixie Shanahan clemency before his term is up. She is not a threat to society. Her current husband certainly isn't going to be beating her. Look what happened to the last one.


Related: Dixie Shanahan Denied Early Release

Friday, July 28, 2006

Dixie Shanahan Denied Early Release


Dixie Shanahan, after her husband beat her up

From the Des Moines Register:
Dixie Shanahan Duty, the Defiance woman who shot her husband as he slept and let his body decompose in the couple's bedroom for more than year, will not get an early release from prison, the state Board of Parole voted unanimously today.

Duty, 38, is serving a 50-year sentence after her 2004 conviction for the second-degree murder of Scott Shanahan, who was described at her trial as an abusive husband.

Shelby County authorities say Duty shot Scott after an argument in August 2002. She then left Shanahan’s body in the couple’s bedroom for more than a year
More background at CourtTV.

Even more in the Iowa Supreme Court opinion upholding her second-degree murder conviction.

Contrast this to Phyllis Nelson, who in 2001 put a knife in husband Dr Richard Nelson, then-executive dean of the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nelson was convicted in 2003 and got a 5-to-10-year sentence but recently jumped over the first hurdle of parole.

Shanahan got a 50 year sentence, but would be eligible for parole in 2039.

Looks like rich and jilted wives can kill their husbands in Iowa and spend a couple years teaching fellow inmates how to play the piano, while those who have been repeatedly abused, beaten, and threatened with forced abortion or death are put away for life.

Not fair.

Des Moines Register Breaking News: Elitist Douchebag Piggybacks Onto RAGBRAI



From the Des Moines Register:
U.S. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts hopped on a bike and is riding part of the RAGBRAI route today, RAGBRAI organizers said. He joined the ride at Williamsburg.
John Kerry is likely the only douchebag riding RAGBRAI on an $8000 Serotta Ottrott.


Update: And although the bigger version of this picture seems to have disappeared from the internet, here's a thumbnail of John Kerry riding his expensive bicycle without a helmet and talking on a cell phone in 2004. What a douchebag.

E85 Rant At The Alternative Energy Blog, Plus More On Corn Stoves



This critique of E85 fuel at the Alternative Energy Blog is worth reading.

It pulls together most criticisms of E85 that this blog has been mentioning over the past year in a single post.

Speaking of corn, Wired has a short article profiling Bixby pellet stoves. Bixby Energy Systems, of Rogers, MN, makes stoves and furances that can heat a 2000 sq ft house for about $2 a day during the winter by burning corn.

Read more on a Bixby corn stove used in Iowa at the Hinkletown web site.

You can also read about Bixby Energy Systems in this Minneapolis Star-Tribune article from May. You'll be surprised with what they're trying to create:
• Upgrading the MaxFire into a 100,000-BTU furnace system that not only would heat a home, but also convert heat into electricity to furnish much of the home's power.

• Building a plant to produce fuel pellets, probably containing readily available waste from sugar-beet and ethanol processing and litter from turkey-production operations.
Off-the-grid completely by burning corn, wood pellets, and other biomass? And heating at a fraction of the cost of propane, oil, and natural gas? That's cool.

Sal Mohamed For President



From the Sioux City Journal:
While Sal Mohamed of Sioux City placed an advertisement in the Journal Thursday inviting the public to his press conference to announce his run for President of the United States, he knows his candidacy could be halted, but is hoping it won't be.

As an Egypt-born man who became a U.S. citizen in 1983, Mohamed could be tripped up by the Constitution wording that "no person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States... shall be eligible for the office of President."
It was nice to see the Democratic Party and the media accept Sal's candidacy in the primary and invite him to debates, some of which he attended.

And while it's somewhat kooky to be a self-financed fringe candidate for governor who stands on street corners waving at people, it's another thing entirely to run for President of the United States when you know you don't even meet the basic qualifications to get on the ballot.

It's funny when Pat Paulsen ran and pathetic when Harold Stassen kept trying.

Sal Mohamed trying to run for President should qualify him for a straightjacket.


(h/t Madman)

Des Moines Register Breaking News: Lance Armstrong Wakes Up, Urinates, Yawns



Stay tuned for more reports from the Des Moines Register, such as Lance has a cup of coffee and Lance eats a donut.


Related: Des Moines Register Breaking News: Lance Armstrong Takes A Shit In Porta-Potty

Thursday, July 27, 2006

The Worthless Jetseta Bill

From the Des Moines Register:
President Bush today signed into law new mandatory minimum sentences that would guarantee punishment for criminals who prey on children, inspired by Jetseta Gage’s suffering and death.

The 10-year-old Cedar Rapids girl was raped and murdered in March 2005 in a crime that stunned and horrified Iowans.

The provisions are named “Jetseta Gage Assured Punishment for Violent Crimes Against Children.”

They are part of a larger bill that also strengthens state sex offender registries, creates a national offender registry and protects children from Internet predators.

I don't know what this has to do with Jetseta Gage, other than Senator Chuck Grassley trying to score some political points or to give out political pork dollars using her name.

May I remind everybody what Jetseta's own mother put her daughter through:
Oh dear, the poor mother didn't know Roger Bentley was on the Iowa Sex Offender list, but HIS BROTHER HAD BEEN SEXUALLY ABUSING HER 10 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER FOR OVER TWO AND A HALF YEARS AND HAD BEEN CHARGED WITH IT. Come on. These stupid white trash mothers with their "boyfriends" and "friends" who are fucking around with children, what is with this particular clay-eating subculture of deviancy?

The media always prefers to play dumb when it comes to shitty "mothers" who should have been forced to get their tubes tied when they were teenagers, not unlike the late Evelyn Miller's "mother" Noel and her child porn-downloading "fiance" Casey Fredricksen.

Where are the columnists who could easily see that Trena Gage associated with these deviants for years while her daughter was fucked with?

Where is the outrage?

Meanwhile, Iowa can't have the death penalty for child-raping killers (thank you, Mike Gronstal), but Tom Vilsack is more than happy to restore prepubescent-probers of their Right To Vote once they get out of the pokey. Because, you know, The People want perverts walking into our elementary schools on election day.

Irony Department: Iowa Pork Producers To Sponsor The Taxpayer-Financed Iowa Speedway



From Radio Iowa:
The newest sponsor for the Iowa Speedway in Newton is the Iowa Pork Producers Association. The commodity group's president-elect Scott Tapper says the partnership's a natural fit. Tapper says since Iowa's the number-one pork-producing state, the organization wanted to make pork the "official meat of the Iowa Speedway."
That makes sense, considering that the Speedway was financed in part by Vilsack giving the owners of $12.5 million sales tax break, millions in tax-increment financing by the residents of Newton (a more thorough list is located here), and a $6.8 million RISE grant from Iowa taxpayers.

More documents here.

Iowa DNR: Burning Cars Are Perfectly Healthy For The Environment



From Radio Iowa:
State environmental experts say they've detected -no- toxins in the smoke rising from a huge fire of thousands of junked cars at a Mason City scrap metal facility. Iowa Department of Natural Resources spokesman Jeff Van Steenberg says they've done air sample tests in a number of areas downwind of the blaze at Behr Mason City and have found nothing hazardous. Van Steenberg says "There wasn't any detectable levels on the ground. Obviously, lots of different things are released in that kind of fire, but we were getting some dispersion in the atmosphere." The air was checked for levels of hydrogen sulfide, benzene, chlorine, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. Oxygen levels were also found to be normal.

Cars are made out of what? Metal. Plastics. Paints. Natural ingredients, right?

Other recent announcements by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources:

"4 out of 5 doctors recommend swimming in pig shit-polluted Iowa lakes"

"Iowa water is fortified with 15 vitamins and minerals, including Atrazine"

and

"Cancer is a valid weight-loss method for some people"

No wonder that Iowa is the most polluted state.

By the way, I was searching around the internet and found a picture of Iowa DNR spokesman Jeff Van Steenberg:



Related: Mason City's Mountain Of Crushed Cars Are Burning

Des Moines Register Breaking News: Lance Armstrong Takes A Shit In Porta-Potty



Yes, the Des Moines Register has had an endless supply of vapid RAGBRAI stories and hyperactive Lance Armstrong sightings.

But this is the bottom story of the day: Lance gets his coconut cream pie

Jim Nussle: Fauxscal Conservative



The Club For Growth has a big post about Congressman Jeff Flake's 19 anti-pork amendments and how they have every House member on record regarding their positions on earmarks (a process through which members of Congress steer federal funding to local projects without going through competitive grant procedures or other objective mechanisms - source).

I figured I'd blog about Jim Ross Nussle, Iowa's Congressman from the 1st District and Republican goobernatorial candidate. Nussle is the House Budget Committee chairman and, according to some groups, supposedly this big fiscal conservative.

When it comes to earmarks, though, Jim Ross Nussle is a fauxscal conservative.

Below is a list of 19 amendments on earmarks that Congressman Flake introduced. A "YES" vote on any of the Flake amendments is a good, anti-pork vote. A "NO" vote is a bad, pro-pork vote. Jim Ross Nussle, fauxscal conservative, voted "NO" in every single instance:

House Vote 190 - Dairy education in Iowa ($229,000)

House Vote 191 - Hydroponic tomato production in Ohio ($180,000)

House Vote 192 - National Grape and Wine Initiative ($100,000)

House Vote 204 - Virginia Science Museum ($250,000)

House Vote 205 - Juniata Locomotive Demonstration ($1,000,000)

House Vote 277 - Swimming pool in Banning, CA ($500,000)

House Vote 278 - “Facilities” in Weirton, West Virginia ($100,000)

House Vote 279 - Multipurpose facility in Yucaipa, California ($500,000)

House Vote 280 - Strand Theater Arts Center in Plattsburgh, New York ($250,000)

House Vote 298 - Mystic Aquarium in New London, Conn. ($1,000,000)

House Vote 299 - The Jason Foundation in Ashburn, VA ($1,000,000)

House Vote 302 - Northwest Manufacturing Initiative ($2,500,000)

House Vote 303 - Lewis Center for Education Research ($4,000,000)

House Vote 304 - Leonard Wood Research Institute ($20,000,000)

House Vote 334 - Arthur Avenue Retail Market ($150,000)

House Vote 335 - Bronx Council for the Arts in Bronx, N.Y. ($300,000)

House Vote 336 - Johnstown Area Regional Industries ($800,000)

House Vote 337 - Fairmont State University ($900,000)

House Vote 338 - Tourism Development Association in Kentucky ($1,000,000)


Jim Ross Nussle.

He's a fauxscal conservative, an earmark kingpin, and a pork-barrel logroller.

But, to be perfectly honest, I doubt Chet Butterburger, Nussle's Democratic opponent in the race for Terrace Hill, would be any different.

David Yepsen Is A Disciple Of Jack Germond


Predictions, Jack Germond, bending just his elbows.

From David Yepsen's column in the Des Moines Register:
I have to watch what I say around the office tea stand. Editorial writer Andie Dominick might quote me.

When I casually asked her last week if she was going on RAGBRAI, she wrote a Saturday item reporting my comments about how we overdo our coverage. She quoted me as saying it was a waste of resources.

Actually, I said it was a "monumental" waste of resources.

It's a bike ride. It's not the Second Coming. It's a great tribute to Spandex, pork chops and rhubarb pie. It's not hard news. It's a feature story. And after 30-some years, it's not a particularly novel feature story anymore.

I write this column with some trepidation because by doing it, I'm just adding to the RAGBRAI glut in the daily paper. But I am a disciple of the Jack Germond school of political reporting. We believe in bending our elbows, not our knees...

...So enjoy the ride, Andie. May the wind be at your back and not from a hog lot. May you not be gouged by the country folks overcharging you city slickers for the granola. And enjoy the countryside. Most of it is private property that shouldn't be eminent domained.

But hurry back. You've got serious opining work to do to convince Iowans they should be for higher taxes and socialized medicine.

Ouch!

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Radio Iowa Blog Covering The David Oman EarthPork Press Conference

David Oman's typically evasive defense of how Iowa Child, The Environmental Project, EarthPork, EarthPark is going to be financed is on full display in Kay Henderson's Radio Iowa blog.

Required reading for all of you following the Pork Forest project.

Des Moines Is Just As Expensive As New York City

From the Des Moines Register, by business editor/serial bullshitter Donnelle Eller:
Lloyd Rose, who moved to Des Moines from the East Coast for his job with AmerUs Life, said Des Moines has more new-home choices than New York City, where density limits new construction.

Rose and his family planned to make an offer on a new home in Waukee on Monday. "You're not necessarily spending less than you would in New York, you're just getting twice as much space for your dollars," said Rose.
Oh, really?

According to ACCRA, 3rd quarter of 2004, the average new home price in Des Moines was $266,690.

The average price for a Manhattan apartment is currently $1,386,000.

That's close, right?

But you get twice the space in Des Moines. That ought to make up the difference.


Update: For single-family existing homes in the NY area, Nassau/Suffolk average value is $475,300. Newark/Union is $405,300. New York/Wayne/White Plains is $528,700. New York/Northern NJ/Long Island is $458,500. Des Moines is $139,600.

Mason City's Mountain Of Crushed Cars Are Burning



From the Mason City Globe Gazette:
Firefighters from five departments battled a mountain of between 6,000 and 8,000 crushed cars at Behr Mason City, 12050 W. State St. early this morning.

The fire, which was reported at just after 5 a.m., created a massive plume of smoke that floated northwest of Mason City. At times the flames shot a couple of hundred feet in the air.

That's going to take a long time to put out.

Iowa Pork Forest

From Radio Iowa's story on EarthPork:
Critics of the project have dubbed it the Iowa Pork Forest and question whether it will deliver the economic side benefits backers claim.
Not only do we critics question whether the economic side benefits will happen, but also whether the project will be able to sustain itself without taxpayer dollars supporting it after being built.

Oman has said in the past that it would take a million paying visitors a year just to break even with expenses. I can't imagine a million people (2739 per day, every day of the year) cumming to Riverside or Pella, unless maybe prostitution was legalized there.

Vonk of the IDNR Wants County Zoning

Jeff Vonk, Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, writing in the Des Moines Register:
Our legislative leaders need to allow the DNR's pending environmental-evaluation rule to take effect next month. We need to give a meaningful voice to citizens who are having their property rights taken by developers of new CAFO sites. This can be done with a simple law change authorizing counties to zone where these facilities can be built — or cannot. Finally, we need to require developers to compensate adjacent landowners for loss of property values when a new facility is built.
Vonk has a lot of good points in this op-ed.

Some counties will have to be dragged kicking and screaming into court before they'll allow zoning of polluting factory farms, mostly because of who's pulling the strings, but I suspect we'll see this sort of thing in all counties within the next decade.

As for requiring developers to compensate adjacent landowners for loss of property values when a new facility is built, that ain't ever gonna happen.

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Vilsack Launches Some Petition Concerning Gas Prices

From the Office of Governor Tom Vilsack's web site:
Governor Tom Vilsack today asked Iowans to join him in calling on President Bush and Congress to address the problem of record high gas prices. The Governor launched an online petition for citizens to join him in his effort. The petition encourages President Bush to follow Iowa’s example of investing in renewable fuels in order to lessen America’s dependence on expensive and unstable foreign oil and to bring down the cost of gasoline in the long-term...

...The average cost of regular unleaded gasoline is currently about $2.88 in Iowa, 70 cents higher than this time last year, and $3.00 nationally, according to AAA’s Fuel Gauge Report. Three other governors (Granholm of Michigan, Doyle of Wisconsin, and Napolitano of Arizona) have launched petitions to galvanize public support.
If every acre of corn was used in the United States, ethanol would only supply 12% of this country's fuel needs.

If every acre of soybeans were used to make biodiesel, they would only supply 6% of current diesel usage.

Don't mention any of that, Vilsack.

What's the price of E85 in Iowa? The Clean Air Choice E85 Price Forum hasn't had a reported price in Iowa for weeks, probably because nobody is buying it.

A few weeks ago, E85 prices in Nebraska were $2.80 a gallon. But the only people buying it were government fleets. Once that batch was going to sell out, the price was going up to $3.60 a gallon. Considering that E85 usually results in a 30% drop in mileage, you'd have to buy $4.70 worth of E85 to get the same mileage as a $2.85 gallon of 100% gasoline.

What a ripoff.

Expect the media in Iowa to eat up Vilsack's petition without bothering to check any of the facts, much less at what price E85 is selling, or factoring in E85's drop in mileage.

EarthPork Update: Down to Riverside and Pella

Go to the Iowa PorkForest web site for very few details.

Vilsack Thinks Dems Can Win With Good Ideas

Updated below



From the Des Moines Register:
Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack today capped his first year as chairman of a national Democratic policy group telling an audience of the state and local elected officials from all over that Democrats could win in November with good ideas.

"The reality is that many of the great solutions to the problems that we face as a nation today are not going to be found on K Street," Vilsack told the annual meeting of the Democratic Leadership Council, a policy-focused party group, at its annual meeting in Denver. "They are going to be found on the main streets of our communities."
Here are some good ideas of Vilsack's:

Got any other bright ideas, Vilsack?


Update:

Almost forgot the following:

State Senators Who Drive Drunk



From the Iowa City Press-Citizen:
Sen. Bob Dvorsky, D-Coralville, received a deferred judgment after pleading guilty late last week to drunken driving from an April traffic stop in Des Moines.

Dvorsky, 57, also was ordered to complete a two-day educational program for first-time drunken drivers, undergo a substance abuse evaluation and complete 30 hours of community service, online court records show. A deferred judgment means that if Dvorsky stays out of trouble for one year, the drunken driving charge will be cleared from his record.
This is probably a typical sentence for first time drunk drivers. At least nobody got hurt, except Dvorsky's cost of automobile insurance in the future.

Giant Testicles and Chicken Shit Bingo

The Political Madman comments on a variety of stories concerning giant testicles in the DM Register.

And don't miss the Chicken Shit Bingo deja vu.

Tax Update Blog Is Back



Don't miss The Tax Update blog's accountant-like take on the Speltz case and the Rockin' Exemption thingamabob.

Yes, there's a Richard Hatch update, too. The Hoosegow Homo is being moved to a prison in Oklahoma.

Mike Whalen: Corn On The Cob, Not In The Gas Tank


Leigh Zisko (left) with Senator Tom Harkin.

A letter in the Quad City Times by Leigh Zisko of Iowa City:
I am one of countless Iowans that proudly fills my gas tank every week with ethanol blend fuel. That is why I was appalled to learn that Mike Whalen served as policy chairman for a group that proposed cutting funding for all ethanol programs and concluded that, “corn deserves a place on the nation’s dinner table for its nutritional value, but it doesn’t belong in the gas tanks of millions of U.S. motor vehicles.”

Eastern Iowa needs a strong representative in Washington who will stand up for agriculture and our livelihood. With his opposition to ethanol, Whalen does not represent my Iowa values.
Considering that gasohol (E10) is currently 10 cents a gallon more expensive than 87 octane unleaded 100% gasoline throughout most of Iowa, especially after a couple decades of E10 being priced cheaper than the non-hooch blend, it's likely that some of the "countless" people buying fuel are no longer choosing E10.

It's one thing to sell people living on the East and West coasts ethanol as an oxygenate additive to replace MTBE, but it's another thing entirely to spend hundreds of millions of dollars pushing E85, a fuel that, currently, is priced at the equivalent of $4.70 a gallon compared to gasoline, and that's before all the tax breaks are figured in.

If Mod Whalen is trying to stop the fleecing of America at the pump, more power to him. Let ethanol, even E10, be at the whim of the market with less government (taxpayer) support.

And what does Leigh Zisko want? More taxpayer subsidies and corporate welfare going to gas station owners for a fuel nobody except government fleets are going to buy?

Yepsen: How Would Political Candidates Cut Property Taxes?

David Yepsen has a thought-provoking column in this morning's Des Moines Register:
[According to a new report by the Iowa Taxpayers Assocation], despite all the promises of "property tax relief" made by state and local politicians in recent years, Iowa has made little, if any, progress...

Iowa had the 10th-highest property taxes for nicer homes in a typical rural community. It's 14th highest for those in Des Moines. Taxes on Iowa's business and apartment properties rank among the top five states in the country, the group said.

Higher property taxes work to depress the sale value of homes. Or, they could be a reason not to improve it...

...So what's to be done?

Property taxes are levied largely by cities, counties and schools. With 99 counties, about 950 cities and 367 school districts, there is room to save through mergers and sharing services and administrators.

State dollars can replace local property tax dollars. Property taxes can also be replaced by local-option income or sales-tax dollars — or by fees. Lawmakers could allow local governments more of these options.
I don't think the false promise of property tax relief through the raising of sales taxes is a good idea. People aren't going to be fooled anymore.

Besides, how high should sales taxes go? When Terry Braindead was the governor back in the early 1980s, somehow Iowa managed on 3%. And that was before gambling was going to pave our schools with gold and cure cancer. Now the State is getting 5% on the sales tax, a 60% increase. Some communities have 1% local option taxes for various things. A few want this pushed to 7%.

Yepsen points out the obvious. Having 99 counties is crazy. It was probably OK when a rare trip to the county seat needed to be made over the course of a day by walking or in a horse-drawn wagon, but those days have been gone for a long time. Iowa could probably get away with consolidating the number of counties down to about nine. I'm sure all the Big Government types will be upset that grandma will have to drive an extra hour to get her driver's license renewed, but I guess that's a small sacrifice compared to what everybody's ancestors had to deal with.

As for school districts, more consolidation is necessary when student population levels keep declining. Expect to see more hyphens and acronyms in the future.

Did Iowa need a bloated, money-burning job training program staffed by a bunch of ex-girlfriends, relatives, and political cronies when unemployment was under 4%? Absolutely not.

I'm sure there are many other examples, like paying off "Christian" singers to the tune of several hundred thousand dollars a year.

Raising other taxes isn't the answer for property tax relief. Starving government of money is. You won't get any politicians to agree to that, at least not any of the candidates in upcoming elections.

Monday, July 24, 2006

Navy Cross For Sgt R.J. Mitchell

From the Des Moines Register:
It seems like a miracle that Sgt. R.J. Mitchell survived his second combat tour in Iraq, based on the Iowa Marine's citation for the Navy Cross.

During a ferocious firefight with six insurgents inside a heavily fortified house in Fallujah, Mitchell courageously attacked the enemy strong point to help rescue five wounded Marines trapped within the house, according to Marine Corps officials.

Disregarding his own safety, he charged through enemy AK-47 rifle fire and hand grenades to assist a critically wounded Marine in an isolated room. Then he moved to another room to assist others.

After he was struck by a bullet ricochet in his left leg and by grenade fragments on his legs and face, Mitchell saw a wounded insurgent reach for a weapon.

"With his rifle inoperable, he drew his combat knife, stabbed the insurgent and eliminated him instantly," the citation reads. "Limping from his own wounds ... Mitchell assisted in the evacuation of the last casualty through the impact zone under enemy fire, ultimately saving the lives of multiple Marines."

This is a vast improvement on the Des Moines Register's reporting, considering how they ignored Silver Star recipient and Marine Corporal Armand McCormick and were very late to the game on reporting on 1st Sgt Brad Kasal, who was put in for a possible Medal Of Honor award.

Jim Leach Wants To Negotiate With Terrorists

From Radio Iowa:
Iowa Congressman Jim Leach says "timely and aggressive" diplomacy needs to be put in place in the Middle East.Leach, a Republican who represents Iowa's second congressional district, wants the Bush administration to establish a peace negotiator for the region. "We can't just let things go on hold," Leach says. "We have to lead." Leach if the United States fails to lead toward peace, other nations will lead the situation in the direction of war and anarchy. "I consider this the most dangerous week in the last generation of American foreign policy," Leach says. Leach says the Secretary of State has hundreds of issues to deal with and, as a member of the House Committee on International Affairs, his suggestion is that a negotiator be chosen whose sole responsibility is to press for reconciliation.
Jim Leach wants to negotiate with Hezbollah, a terrorist organization committed to getting rid of Israel and killing Jews? He's crazy.

The Ron Speltz Update



Andie Dominick The Register Editorial Board has weighed in on the matter of Ron Speltz, the greedy stock options holder from McLeod USA who exercised options worth $711,118 in 2000 but didn't bother unloading most of the stock until it was worth almost nothing:
In 1992, Ron took a job with McLeodUSA, then a small telecommunications start-up. Compensation included stock options, which he saved for a family nest egg. In 2000, he and June consulted a financial adviser on the best way to cash out the stock. The adviser told them to exercise the stock options and hold the stock for a year to take advantage of low tax rates on capital gains.

Then the stock price fell. What was once worth about $700,000 became worth about $2,000. Yet, they owed more than $250,000 in state and federal taxes due to a quirk in the Alternative Minimum Tax law that targets Incentive Stock Options (ISO-AMT).

When we wrote about the Speltzes and other Iowans in similar straits earlier this year, we received a few letters to the editor stating it was their greed and desire to avoid paying taxes that landed them in such a predicament.

Yes, they tried to take full advantage of tax law. Who doesn’t? But at the end of the day, Americans should not have to pay taxes on money they never collected. It amounts to the U.S. government taking money from people it shouldn’t be entitled to. It’s hard to believe Congress intended such consequences for people whose employers, like McLeod, go bankrupt.
Andie Dominick, who wrote the editorial, left out a lot of information about Speltz.

Mr Speltz would have had options worth around $500,000 in 2000 after he paid his short-term capital gains. He could have sold his options as late as April, 2001, and still been able to pay his taxes and get a small amount of cash.

In addition, The Speltzes cashed out some stock along the way, about $66,000 worth, before eventually cashing it all out at rock bottom value at the year's end (source: Speltz v. Commissioner PDF).

The editorial ends like this:
Here’s a glimmer of hope: When we checked with Sen. Charles Grassley’s office last week, his aide, Jill Kozeny, said the senator was “working to get included some ISO-AMT relief for middle-income taxpayers” in what’s called the “extenders” tax bill being negotiated in a conference committee...

...The senator is the Speltzes’ last hope.
If I'm not mistaken, I don't think the Speltzes would get anything if new legislation passed. A law changing the computation of the "bargain element" as a basis for income certainly wouldn't be made retroactive back to 2000. Who is Andie Dominick and the Register Editorial Board kidding?

Realistically, Congress should eliminate the ability for people vested in company stock option plans from exercising the options but not selling the stock. It's one thing if professional financial traders like Gordon Gekko use this mechanism for whatever reason, but it's not the sort of thing that individuals should be allowed to do.

What's never been fully explained in the press is whether the Speltzes initiated litigation against the financial adviser who gave the advice to exercise the options but not sell the stock. I always got the impression from past articles that the Speltzes didn't, and the consultation was little more than a telephone call. I also got the impression that the Speltzes didn't bother with consulting with any tax advisors during this time, otherwise the Speltzes could have avoided this catastrophe.

Welcome Iowa Sex Offenders

More unintended consequences from Iowa's sex offender residency law:
Iowa's laws restricting where sex offenders can live are causing some of them to live at campgrounds around the state.

Some sex offenders are listing campgrounds in county and state parks as their home addresses...

Linn County Sheriff Don Zeller said that sex offenders have been in all of the county parks and some of the state parks.
But don't worry, Mike Gronstal isn't going to tamper with the law.

Sunday, July 23, 2006

Rock In Prevention Taxpayer Ripoff Update

Clark Kauffman finally has an update on the Rock In Prevention scandal in the Sunday Des Moines Register:
A controversial, publicly financed Des Moines charity routed $315,732 to its executive director last year - an amount that represents almost 39 percent of the agency's total spending.

The money was paid after state lawmakers agreed to directly finance Rock In Prevention Inc. with $600,000 in Iowa taxpayers' money. The Legislature's action enabled the charity to bypass the normal, grant-application process through which private organizations typically must compete for public money...

...In recent years, the government has been Rock In Prevention's single biggest contributor. The biggest private donor has been Don Lamberti, the father of Senate Republican Co-President Jeff Lamberti of Ankeny. The senior Lamberti is founder of Casey's General Stores and last year gave the charity $98,392 in Casey's common stock.
And from the sidebar:
...After federal officials cut off financing for Rock In Prevention due to questions over the program's effectiveness, state lawmakers stepped in and awarded the agency $600,000 in public money through a no-compete contract.

Taxpayers were billed $298,000 for a recent evaluation of the agency's effectiveness. But that study was conducted by researchers who previously worked for Rock In Prevention. The lead researcher redesigned the program, then evaluated it and declared it a success.
What's missing from the Kauffman piece is an explanation of how McManus was able to convince State legislators to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on his taxpayer-leeching scam.

I think we know how all this happens. Don "Casey's General Stores" Lamberti is the biggest private donor. Don's son, State Senator Jeff Lameberti, just happened to be on the Appropriations Committee in the Iowa Legislature. I think we can all add two and two together, or, in this case, $300,000 and $300,000.

Rock In Prevention is nothing but a scam. Pat McManus is nothing but a Christian leech, sucking the blood out of state taxpayers. And Jeff Lamberti is derti and a complete hypocrite.

This is just another CIETC-like scandal, created by Republicans this time, and it stinks just as badly.

Go Boswell.

Saturday, July 22, 2006

Ramona Cunningham Was Worth The Current Entire Des Moines Animal Control Unit


GED recipient and former $360,000-a-year CIETC head Ramona Cunningham with Senator Tom Harkin at the dedication of the "Tom Harkin Learning Center" at CIETC offices in October 20, 2004.

From the Des Moines Register's Editorial Board:
We chuckled earlier this month when Des Moines Mayor Frank Cownie said that on occasion he had scooped up small critters like dead rabbits outside his home and tossed them into the garbage. As Des Moines residents usually do, he saw a job that needed done and took matters into his own hands.

In 2003, city budget shortfalls resulted in eliminating half the animal-control force at the Des Moines Police Department.

Now there are only five officers responsible for everything from dog bites to injured animals to responding to animal complaints.

Five officers.

Guess what? Five officers is equivalent of how much former CIETC head Ramona Cunningham was worth paying each year: $360,000.

Despite these sorts of out-of-whack priorities, the Socialists on the Editorial Board want taxes raised even higher:
Iowa cities need more options than taxing homeowners to cover basic operating needs. The Legislature should allow cities to raise dollars through alternative sources, like franchise fees, to cover general expenses.
Franchise fees? Everybody would have to pay those as long as they had natural gas or electricity lines hooked up to their house. So what's the difference?

If you have a $100,000 house in Des Moines, you're already paying nearly $2000 a year in property taxes. How much more should it cost to exist in Des Moines?

Crabby Andie Dominick



Meow:
Register columnist David Yepsen recently asked me if I was riding RAGBRAI again. When I told him I was, he replied that sending editorial writers on the week-long bike ride was a waste of resources. Instead, I should be at the office doing something "more important," as I recall his words.

Thankfully, our editor doesn't share his opinion. Senior editorial columnist Richard Doak and I are heading to Sergeant Bluff today. During the upcoming week, we'll share our RAGBRAI experiences in a diary on the editorial page...

...But to answer David, pedaling our way across the state on RAGBRAI is in perfect keeping with a guiding principle of this page, which states: "We are dedicated to progress and to Iowa."

...But since David apparently will be missing our typical editorials, as soon as we dip our tires in the Mississippi, we'll rush right back to the office and start writing on Medicare and taxes again.

What a bitch.

Airing petty little grievances with a co-worker who supposedly isn't as "progressive" as you on the editorial page of central Iowa's monopoly corporate newspaper is ridiculous.

Besides, David Yepsen should be forced to ride a bike across Iowa. He could lose a few pounds.

Friday, July 21, 2006

"Creative Writer" Andie Dominick to Update The Ron Speltz Story

From Carol Hunter's blahg at the Des Moines Register:
Dominick also will catch up with Ron and June Speltz of Ely, who have faced financial ruin, caught up in the red tape of the federal Alternative Minimum Tax law. They’re being taxed on stock-option gains they never collected.

There’s at least a chance that Iowa’s Sen. Charles Grassley can squeeze some relief from unfair AMT rules in a tax bill that’s in a conference committee.
I think we know which way Carol Hunter and Andie "Creative Writer" Dominick are going to spin the Ron Speltz story.

History here at the Tax Update Blog:
Ronald J. Speltz, of Ely, Iowa, was earning about $75,000 annually as a senior manager for McLeodUSA. He exercised McLeod ISOs in 2000 with a bargain element of $711,118, resulting in $206,191 of AMT. Mr. and Mrs. Speltz also owed Iowa AMT of $46,792

As many Iowans know, McLeod's stock collapsed. Mr. Speltz found himself with a $206,000 tax bill on now nearly-worthless McLeod ISO shares.
Speltz exercised the options, but didn't sell his stock. Don't expect the Register to explain the finer points of all this.

In my opinion, exercising options without selling the stock is a colossally stupid move. It's incredibly risky even if you're a seasoned financial professional. Would you let some HIV-positive person have unprotected anal sex with you? It's about that risky.

Speltz rode the stock nearly to the bottom, cashing out with $2000 just before McLeod USA went bankrupt the first time. Update: It was actually closer to $68,000 (source: Speltz v. Commissioner PDF).

When the IRS wouldn't accept Speltz's settlement of $4457 on a tax bill that was $148,744, he went crying to the media who promptly spun his story of greed and ignorance into a story of victimization.

As for Chuck "fauxscal conservative" Grassley, he should be working on legislation that takes the AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax) and updates the income levels to whatever it was when it was enacted back in 1969 and indexes it to inflation figures since that time. Grassley shouldn't be saving the asses of greedy dunces who fail to read the fine print.

I can just guess the way that Dominick will spin the Speltz story, but I'll hold off commenting until I see it in print.

National Lampoon's Beirut Vacation



Unfunny opinion columnist Ken Fuson has a straight story in today's Register about a Des Moines pediatrician who took his family for vacation in Beirut this summer.

Sure, it's easy to point out the obvious, like Fuson's inability to let readers know (it must be Register or Gannett policy to fail to mention this) that the State Department has issued a travel warning for Lebanon since November of 2005.

On that note, how about a short parody?
They had checked their bags at the Beirut airport and headed toward the departure gate. It had been a wonderful vacation for Dr. Clark W. Griswold and his family.

Then they heard the explosions.

"We're ten hours from the fucking fun park and the bombing starts. Well I'll tell you something. This is no longer a vacation. It's a quest. It's a quest for fun. I'm gonna have fun and you're gonna have fun. We're all gonna have so much fucking fun we'll need plastic surgeory to remove our godamn smiles. You'll be whistling 'Zip-A-Dee Doo-Dah' out of you're assholes! I gotta be crazy! I'm on a pilgrimage to see a moose. Praise Marty Moose! Holy Shit!," Griswold said.

Griswold and his family - wife Ellen, son Rusty, 17, and daughter Audrey, 15 - were in a hotel room in Cyprus Thursday after spending a harrowing six nights listening to Israeli warplanes drop bombs on Lebanon.

Soon they were out of cash.

"I told the hotel desk clerk that I'm making out a check for $1000, all you have to do is give me $300 in cash and keep the $700, all for doing nothing more than acting like a total creep. ," said Griswold, a pediatrician at Blank Children's Hospital in Des Moines. "I just want you to ask yourself one thing. If you were... if you were me, wouldn't you do the same thing for your children?"
(quote source)

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Vilsack Is Always Complaining About Bush



From the Des Moines Register:
Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack today criticized the U.S. effort to evacuate Americans from Lebanon, calling it slow and a result of the Bush administration being “asleep at the switch” in its diplomatic efforts in the region.

“Clearly other countries appear to have been better prepared to evacuate their citizens than America was,” Vilsack said in an interview.

Looks like the rabid, Bush-hating wing of the Democratic party is up to their old tricks again.

Naturally, the Des Moines Register fails to mention that the State Department has had a travel warning for US residents going to Lebanon since November 7, 2005.

Does Vilsack understand what a travel warning entails? When one is issued, college and universities suspend sending students to those countries. Vacation travel is discouraged. And even though we have an embassy in Lebanon, they can't be expected to save your ass.

I think Vilsack is just trying to earn some Kossack brownie points.

Expect to see the usual anti-Bush editorials about this. They'll dredge up Katrina, the tornado that hit Iowa City, and maybe even that recent asteroid flying by the Earth as examples of Bush's incompetence.

More information about the US Embassy in Lebanon here.

Krusty's Butterburger Breakdown



Krusty is following the money the Culver goobernatorial kampaign is raising and, unlike the Des Moines Register, has a breakdown of the PAC and out-of-state contributions.

Read the comments, too.

And yes, Culver had a primary fight until recently. But while Nussle has had over 9000 Iowa donors, Culver had just 334 in last reporting period. Ouch.

Tacky Davenport



From the Quad City Times
:
Not everyone is an art critic, but most people claim to know what they like when they see it. And the thought of a 25-foot-high push pin sculpture marking the spot on Davenport’s riverfront where two major bike trails intersect curdled the blood of some Levee Improvement Commission members Wednesday as the panel got a look at computer-generated images of it.

“I think it’s hideous,” Kelli Grubbs of the commission blurted out as the images were projected on a wall screen.

“I thought it was a joke when you put it up there,” said Mary Dubert, another member of the commission.

But Mayor Ed Winborn called the notion of a jumbo stick pin marking the intersection of the Mississippi River Trail in Davenport and the American Discovery Trail across River Drive from the soon-to-be-completed Bechtel-Lincoln Public Park a “fun” idea.

So if you get caught in the rain while walking along the riverfront in Davenport, you can take refuge under a tack shelter, right?

I think Joe at the Tax Update Blog should sue. Or maybe design it. Here's his prototype for a tacks shelter from early 2005:




(H/T: Krusty)

Iowa Ennui and Todd Dorman on Hog Lots And Hot Czars



Iowa Ennui has a great post on the whole eminent domain issue when it comes to hog lots, based on a Todd Dorman blog entry.

Jew Haters In Iowa Get Back On Their Soapbox



Check out the start of this Writer's Group op-ed column in today's Iowa City Press-Citizen by David Goodner:
As thousands of refugees flee from Israel's war of terror against the Palestinian and Lebanese people, two University of Iowa students and a group of Iowa City residents are preparing to jump headfirst into the sandstorm.

Shame on the Press-Citizen for printing this anti-Semitic crap.

Everybody should know that Hizbollah, a terrorist group advocating the complete destruction of the State of Israel and the establishment of Islamic rule over Jerusalem, and armed by Syria and Iran, started this.


Update: Followup letters to the Iowa City Press-Citizen:
The first sentence of David Goodner's column ("Into the fire: Local residents off to Israel," July 20) describes the current battle being played out by Hezbollah and Israel as "Israel's war of terror." There are a few things Goodner apparently needs an education on in regard to what is considered terrorism.

• Israel has not hijacked planes, used suicide bombers or otherwise targeted civilians as a response to Hezbollah's attacks. Hezbollah purposely stations its rocket launchers in highly populated civilian areas. These are what are being targeted. They are undeniably military targets.

• Israel's response is due to Hezbollah's invasion of the Israeli state in the process of taking soldiers hostage and its consistent attacks on Israeli civilians. It is not being done because Hezbollah has not converted to Judaism or because Hezbollah holds land they desire to take.

• Hezbollah holds 21 of the parliamentary seats in Lebanon's government. Much as Hamas was elected to power by Palestinian citizens, so the Lebanese have elected their representative government. That government is responsible for the actions of Hezbollah, because they allow it to exist and attack Israel freely.

• Israel gave advance notice of its intentions to attack Hezbollah to southern Lebanese citizens by dropping fliers. Terrorists do not give advance notice. They specifically target civilians. They attack, not in defense of their country or family, but for radical religious and political purposes.

Goodner's disagreement with Israel's action as "disproportionate" is his right. Many people think there should be less bombing and more talking. I wish Andrew Swift and the others well on their trip.

His attempt to discredit Israel's right to self-defense as an act of terror, however, is a perfect example of the partisan rhetoric and venom that speaks to the polarization of the country. He and others would do well to stop vilifying people they disagree with and take their own advice by joining in "peaceful" dialogue.

Mark LeRette
Muscatine


David Goodner has demonstrated hate for liberal Western values and Israel once again ("Into the fire: Local residents off to Israel," July 20). He referred to "Israel's war of terror" without mentioning that its intended targets are not "the Palestinian and Lebanese people." Rather, Israel targets terror organizations, Hamas and Hezbollah, which regrettably operate from dense population centers.

It is because these organizations operate outside international law that causes unfortunate civilian body counts. These terrorists violate the laws of war not only by targeting civilians, but also by hiding among civilians and refusing to wear identifiable insignia. This latter conduct is what causes so many civilian deaths despite Israel's perseverance in preventing civilian casualties.

Goodner's column ordinarily would be shocking. However, he revealed earlier in the week to a group rallying in support of Israel that he thinks Hamas and Hezbollah are morally superior to Israel. To him, the one with bigger weapons is wrong without regard to the evil intent of the other side. Even key members of the Arab League, who sought to annihilate Israel three times in the last century, have chastised Hezbollah for their disruption of years of peace between Israel and Lebanon.

Goodner's moral confusion puts him in an extreme minority. His values are closer to those of the terrorists he supports than those of the Arab League or the liberal West.

James Eaves-Johnson
Coralville

17% Tax Increase For Polk County Put On Hold

From the Des Moines Register:
A plan that would have asked voters in November to approve a 1-cent sales tax in Polk, Dallas and Warren counties has been put on hold for a year.

Advocates of the plan generally agreed that the political climate was not right for the proposal to gain the majority vote needed to pass. They cited the cesspool of mistrust in elected officials created by the Central Iowa Employment and Training Consortium salary scandal.

Controversy over how Polk County school officials have spent sales tax money also has hurt the chances that the proposal would pass, they said.
Like sentiment is going to change in the next year?

Obviously, somebody took a poll and the tax increase probably got 10% approval. Couple that with what is undoubtedly going to be some close elections this November and the Republicans would make making sausage of Democrats in Polk County. No wonder the tax increase proposal was withdrawn.



Update: The Register Editorial Board's take:
There were other strikes against the sales-tax proposal besides the poster child for government ineptitude. It did not help when local governments were unfairly thrashed during the Legislature's battle with the governor over eminent domain...

The basic concept is a good one...

The decision to push the sales-tax referendum until next summer was a recognition of an altered electoral climate.


OK, whatever you say, Register Editorial Board.


And then there's Yepsen's much more realistic column:
It was destined for defeat...

But recent polls taken by the organizers showed a dip in support for the idea in the wake of the CIETC scandal. The atmosphere is "poisoned," said Jeff Link, a Democratic consultant for the campaign.
Er, was there a Republican consultant for the campaign?

Just joking...
So, the Destiny folks opted for a new destination. They now plan to let voters cool off and place the idea on a special-election ballot in the summer of 2007.
Can you imagine how nasty the climate will be then? Archie Brooks and Tom "Rubber Stamp" Vlassis will probably still be on the Des Moines City Council because they'll have to die before they'll resign. More CIETC scandal stuff will keep trickling out. People will continue to talk about this, especially us bloggers. Project Density is so fucked.

More CIETC Rubber Stamps


GED recipient and former CIETC head Ramona Cunningham with Senator Tom Harkin

From the Des Moines Register:
For years, the secretary-treasurer of the Central Iowa Employment and Training Consortium board of directors signed off on agency spending without seeing the expenses.

Sherry Howard, who told her story to state lawmakers Wednesday, would come to CIETC offices every three to six months to sign a sheet of paper that said only: "Approved by."

Howard said she was told her signature was signing off on claims and invoices for operational expenses for the government agency responsible for job training. "I did not physically see each claim that came into CIETC," she said. "... My understanding was that I was signing the bills."

...Howard, who is the Story County supervisors' administrative officer, said that when she became the consortium's secretary-treasurer in January 2003 she routinely inspected the agency's expenditures and physically signed off on every invoice that needed to be paid.

But in July 2003, she said, Cunningham and Bargman told her that the state was requiring a new accounting system and that she would stop the detailed inspections. Instead, Howard said, she was told to come to the office in irregular intervals, often between three and six months, to sign off on the invoices, which were not listed on what she signed.

At the time, she said, she never questioned the new procedure but noted that "most recently" the practice has bothered her.

"Most Recently"

We know what that means.

When. Ya. Got. Caught.

Hitlery/Vilsack: Free Money For College

From the Des Moines Register:
Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack and U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., appeared together here Wednesday to tout a new $220 billion Democratic initiative to send more students to college in the face of soaring tuition rates.

Where's the money for this?
It would be paid for by picking it off the money tree cutting corporate subsidies, Clinton said.

Reporter Jane Norman didn't have to travel far to find a lie her quote:
Quincy Collins, 20, a junior at Alabama A&M University and an intern Capital Hill, said that "too many students don't go to college because it costs too much"
BS.

More people are going to colleges and universities today than ever before.


State 29 Related: Higher Education And Debt

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Nicholas Johnson on Transfers Of Property

From Nicholas Johnson's blog:
...what baffles me is how legislators who bring such passion to being against the transfer of one individual's property to the private profit of another through the use of eminent domain -- with this near-unanimous, first veto override in 43 years -- can become so huffily hostile and defensive when asked to justify their enthusiasm for the Iowa Values Fund or TIFs.

What, exactly, is the difference?

Great question.

Lots of great posts at Nick's new blog, From DC 2 Iowa. Just keep scrolling. Read the comments, too.

Yepsenblog: Project Density To Delay Tax Hike Vote

From the Yepsenblog:
Organizers of the “Project Destiny” plan for a local option sales tax vote in Polk, Warren and Dallas counties this November said Wednesday morning they are likely to postpone the effort for a year.

Sources close to the campaign say their polls show public support for the idea has tanked in the wake of the controversy over the Central Iowa Employment and Training Consortium (CIETC.)

Tanked?


Is Yepsen suggesting that the proposed tax hike actually had a chance of passing at one point in time? I doubt it ever did.

Attention Thieves: Go Steal Shit From The University Of Iowa. They Leave The Doors Open All The Time.

From the Daily Iowan in Iowa City:
In light of break-ins and thefts over the past couple of years, The Daily Iowan once again performed a late-night spot check on campus buildings to discover any shortcomings in security.

Last summer's late-night lock check uncovered six unsecured doors at UI administrative and academic buildings. This year's check - performed Monday between 11 p.m. and midnight - found unlatched or unlocked doors in the Pappajohn Business Building and the Chemistry Building. Both buildings are repeat offenders from last summer's check.

Four buildings that were unsecured last year but safely locked this year include the Pomerantz Center, MacLean Hall, Gilmore Hall, and Calvin Hall...

Every one of the Chemistry Building's east side doors were both unlatched and unlocked. On Tuesday, the UI police refused to comment on the security issue.

Security deficiencies may have contributed to previous break-ins at UI buildings, some of which yielded thousands of dollars in stolen property.

Opportunistic thieves and vandals have hit the university hard in recent years, particularly in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication and the communication-studies department. The Becker Communications Studies Building and the Adler Journalism Building have suffered $72,546 in stolen or damaged property since 2004, according to UI police records. Thus far, unlocked doors have yet to be indicated as a factor in the thefts.
It seems the University of Iowa has learned nothing since animal rights terrorists did $450,000 worth of damage to a building in 2004.

Considering that the University of Iowa spent two years writing the Student Athlete Code Of Conduct following former Hawkeye basketball rapist Pierre Pierce's first sexual assault whitewash and his second public display of keeping it real, it'll probably take a couple of decades to get a comprehensive building security plan worked out.

Salon Broads And Femi-Nasties Have No Sense Of Humor



From the Broadsheet at Salon.com:
Hapless "hoosegow honey" horndogs

Oh good God. This is just moronic. Yesterday Boing Boing picked up a story about some online brainiac (also known as conservative blogger David Burge of Iowahawk) who gets his rocks off by publishing the mug shots of women who have been arrested and brought to the Des Moines Polk County Jail. Recently, he decided to hold a contest, publishing photos of the arrestees he deems attractive enough and asking readers to vote for the "Hawkeye Hoosegow Honey of the Year."

Jessica at Feministing calls the whole contest "so classy it hurts," but I was particularly moved by Boing Boing's post, which -- correct me if I'm wrong -- seems pretty freakin' charmed by the whole pathetic episode and blithely reports "Jesika" as the winner of the contest.

Meanwhile, Iowahawk has already posted a photo nomination (from someone named "Cletus of Des Moines") for next year's contest: a sad young woman whose age, height, weight, alleged crime and bail amount he also reveals. Because that is exactly what passes for titillating thrills in Iowahawk's and Cletus' world.

Boys, get a hobby.

Reacting to the femi-nasty complaints, Iowahawk has decided that this summer is the perfect time to re-run his "Hungry Like Naomi Wolf" column from 2004.

It all started back on January 9, 2005, when this blog discovered that the Polk County (Iowa) Jail in Des Moines started putting inmate information and mug shots on the web.

Scrolling through the human debris, and there's a lot of it, you can't help but notice the occasional young and relatively cute women being processed. How did they get there?

It's a legitimate question.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

"Creative Writer" Andie Dominick Doesn't Like The Way President Bush Eats



Andie Dominick, one of the members of the Register Editorial Board, had this to say today in her rarely-read blog:
The fact that President Bush was caught on tape using the “s-word” isn’t really the appeal of this story. It’s the video, which I’ve seen a few times now. It’s the open-mouthed chewing. It’s the talking with his mouth full. It’s the way the President of the United States, well, conducts himself at a lunch with world leaders that makes the story so entertaining.

Leaning over the seat, chewing away, cussing. Just like “us” out here, right? Isn’t that what people say makes this president so darn personally appealing–because he’s just the kind of guy you’d want to have a drink with?

But maybe not lunch.

Nice sarcasm there, Andie.

Don't talk about the substance of what Bush and Blair are discussing. Bitch about the way the President eats, talks, and cusses. Then follow up with a snarky comment about drinking. Real clever.

Andie, of course, has her degree in creative writing. It probably comes in helpful when the Register Editorial Board is pumping out lie after lie.

University of Iowa Assistant Journalism Professor: "What Jon Stewart produces is the news"



From the Iowa City Press-Citizen:
Frank Durham, a University of Iowa assistant journalism professor, leads a 240-person lecture where he said more than half the class indicated "The Daily Show" was their only source of news. He said in other classes some students only read the newspaper if it is required for an assignment.

"What Jon Stewart produces is the news," Durham said. "Someone who only watches 'The Daily Show' still knows the daily events of the day as the agenda is set by that show."

Replace "Jon Stewart" with "Rush Limbaugh" or "Sean Hannity" and I think you'd have a different reaction from the media as well as journalism professors. Something on the order of bitter anger.

Chet Butterburger's First Annual Notary Conference



Krusty is all over Chet Butterburger's First Annual Notary Conference.

It almost seems like a joke, except it's not. Chet Culver is actually going to have taxpayers foot the bill for a (first) convention of Iowa notaries just a few weeks before the gubernatorial election.

How much is that going to cost? How many notaries are going to show up at $50 per plus commuting, hotels, and having to take a day off of work? HyVee Hall ain't cheap to rent, y'know.


Pork Related: Chet Atkins vs Culver's Butter Burgers

State 29, The "Insightfully Vulgar" Blog

From the Johnson County Republican Blog (there is only one Republican in Johnson County, right?):
In tomorrow's Register, read about how Johnson went to China, reviving trade and diplomatic relations and how Jimmy Carter won the Cold War.

Hat tip to the insightfully vulgar State 29.
That's a great quote.


Update: State 29 has had over 20,000 unique visitors in the past month.

Lure them with the vulgar, keep them coming back with the insightful.

Monday, July 17, 2006

"Recall that the last time the Democrats controlled Congress, they produced healthy budget surpluses" - Part Deux



Not content with merely lying about what political party was in charge of Congress during the time when budget surpluses were happening ("Recall that the last time the Democrats controlled Congress, they produced healthy budget surpluses" - July 13, 2006), the Des Moines Register Editorial Board proudly stands by their lie in today's edition with this absurd justification:
Letters elsewhere on the page take us to task for saying that Democrats produced a budget surplus the last time they controlled Congress.

We’ll stand by our assertion.

It’s true that Republicans happened to hold majorities in Congress in the late 1990s, when a budget surplus was finally achieved, but they weren’t responsible for it.

The surplus was a consequence of President Clinton’s five-year economic program, which was approved in 1993, when Democrats were in the majority. Not a single Republican voted for the plan.

The five-year plan succeeded in balancing the budget right on schedule, in 1998.
I remember watching Laura D'Andrea Tyson, Clinton's national economic advisor, on CNBC/FNN in early 1995, talking about the deficit. She had a chart which detailed the Clinton economic plan concerning the deficit. The chart had $200 billion deficits that rose slowly until about FY 2001-2002 when the yearly deficit was expected to hit about $300 billion a year.

That's what I remember.

For balance, here's a report by Christopher Frenze, Chief Economist to the Vice Chairman, that looks like it was published in the late 1990s. I know Frenze is a Conservative economist, but his recall of history is an interesting comparison to the Register Editorial Board (none of whom are economists):
A review of the budget data shows that the 1993 tax increase was devoted to federal spending increases, and that the decline in the deficit since 1992 is accounted for by factors unrelated to the 1993 tax increase. The largest single reason the deficit has declined in recent years is a continuation of the business cycle upswing underway since 1991. Special accounting factors and a reduction in discretionary defense spending explain the balance of the deficit decline since 1992.

In recent months a variety of officials in the Clinton Administration have asserted that its policies have been responsible for the reduction in the budget deficit and continued economic expansion in recent years. While such claims from an incumbent Administration are to be expected under current circumstances, a review of the facts is needed to determine whether such assertions are credible or not.

The key to appraising such claims is the extent to which Clinton policies reduced the budget deficit, and the extent to which lower interest rates and higher economic growth followed. This paper will examine the Administration rationale for President Clinton's 1993 tax increase, and subsequent changes in interest rates and economic growth.

An analysis of the relationship between the deficit and the current economic expansion finds that Administration arguments reverse cause and effect. Deficit reduction did not cause an economic rebound; instead, a cyclical upswing already underway in 1992 was the largest single reason the deficit has declined in recent years. Furthermore, a nonpartisan appraisal would suggest that neither President Bush nor President Clinton deserve credit for the business cycle upswing that began in 1991...

[conclusion:]

...all of the 1993 tax increase has been used to finance additional domestic and entitlement federal spending increases. Since 1995, the more recent progress in fiscal 1996 is due to faster than expected revenue growth and slower outlay growth, especially the savings due to Congressional actions to restrain spending. This more stringent approach to domestic discretionary appropriations by the new Congress has resulted in further progress on reducing the structural deficit in 1996.

It's not a long read, but I don't want to reproduce everything in this entry. Read it for yourself.

Finally in the Frenze piece, and I found this very amusing, here's how Bill Clinton came to understand how the baseline budgeting process worked:
The analysis in this paper is based on cash accounting concepts from actual budget data, as opposed to changes in hypothetical budget levels postulated in baseline budgeting. The disuse of baseline budget concepts means that changes in spending levels from one year to another are the basis of analysis. For example, if a spending level has increased from 1992 to 1995, this is regarded as an increase, regardless of whether use of a baseline concept would designate it as a cut because the increase was below some hypothetical growth path. Baseline budget concepts have been questioned by many, including President Clinton. Recently when asked about the term "cuts" applied to slower than projected increases, President Clinton said, "When I came to Washington, I was amazed when I proposed budgets that that was the language that was used. The press used it. We all learned to use it from the press."
Beautiful! Classic Clinton! That's what I liked about Bill Clinton. Too bad about his personal life.

As for the Register Editorial Board, their hyper-partisanship is ridiculous. That they have to go to the point of lying in order make their point shows how desperate they are to appear relevant.

Number Six

From the Press-Citizen:
Iowa City ranks as the No. 74 best city in which to live in the United States, according to the latest survey by Money magazine.

Cedar Rapids came in the highest of all Iowa cities at No. 64. West Des Moines clocked in just ahead of Iowa City at No. 71...

1. Fort Collins, Colo.
2. Naperville, Ill.
3. Sugar Land, Texas
4. Columbia/Ellicott City, Md.
5. Cary, N.C.
6. Overland Park, Kan.
7. Scottsdale, Ariz.
8. Boise, Idaho
9. Fairfield, Conn.
10. Eden Prairie, Minn.

Overland Park is nice. I don't know if it's worthy of being #6, but I'm happy here.

Sunday, July 16, 2006

Pay No Attention To That Thomas Beaumont Behind The Curtain



Here's the headline in the Des Moines Register:

Veto defeat not seen as hurting Vilsack bid

And here are a few snippets from the Thomas Beaumont article featuring said headline:
And though some in Vilsack’s party say the friction caused by the veto is not enough to damage his chances of winning their support in a possible campaign for the 2008 Iowa caucuses, it did little to help his cause...


Vilsack has company among governors who are weighing 2008 presidential campaigns and who have had vetoes nullified.

But Vilsack is the only one from Iowa, where he alone would be expected from the outset to win the lead-off Iowa caucuses, should he run...


...few Democratic lawmakers are ready to commit to Vilsack for president — or anyone, although prospective candidates have already begun soliciting them for their support — 18 months before the caucuses are expected to be held...


...Vilsack pointedly told a roomful of Senate and House Democrats in private Friday to refrain from characterizing the override as striking a blow for “the little guy,”


...Senate Democratic Leader Mike Gronstal of Council Bluffs said that Vilsack has explained that the veto was intended to protect communities’ ability to pursue economic development, a hallmark of Vilsack’s two terms.

“I know my members respect him for that, though they disagree on the veto,” Gronstal said. “And I have no doubt that if Gov. Vilsack runs for president, he would enjoy wide support among Democrats in the Legislature and win the Iowa caucuses.”

That Gronstal quote is too funny. How obsequious can Gronstal get? What a clown.

Besides Thomas Beaumont's overall propaganda piece story being a mess, does he have amnesia? Last month, Beaumont's newspaper ran the results of a poll taken of registered voters in Iowa who plan to attend the Democratic caucus. The poll listed their pecking order choices. Vilsack came in fourth behind John Kerry.

The Rural Broadband Ripoff

Two letters worth noting in today's Des Moines Register:
Current Internet providers are doing the job

This is in response to a letter to the editor written by Thomas Dorr from the U.S. Department of Agriculture regarding a loan program to extend broadband services to rural communities (“USDA Works To Wire Rural America,” June 18).

Qwest is committed to customers in Iowa, and we currently serve 124 exchanges. Of those, we provide high-speed Internet service to 107 exchanges. By the end of this year, Qwest will have high-speed Internet service deployed to every exchange that we serve in the state.

I, too, have some concerns about these loans and our tax dollars going to new companies. The most recent Iowa Utilities Board Broadband Survey found that nearly 93 percent of Iowa’s communities already have access to high-speed Internet services.

It does not seem justified to incentivize another provider for areas already served with high-speed Internet service. Instead, funds should be made available to existing providers to service the most difficult and costly customers.

Consider all existing broadband competition, from providers of high-speed Internet, cable modem, wireless and WiFi networks, in a given community before granting a subsidized loan to yet another new entrant.

— Max Phillips, president, Qwest in Iowa, Des Moines.

And also:
Money for rural broadband squandered by USDA

There is a federal government program that cries out desperately for public scrutiny: It’s a little-known federal loan program created to help build high-speed Internet connections to rural areas.

The program’s goal is to close the digital divide in rural America — a goal shared by members of our association.

But according to a report by U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Inspector General, the program has misdirected many millions of taxpayer dollars by funding companies that serve suburban customers in areas where broadband service is already available.

The 2002 farm bill created the Broadband Grant and Loan Programs within the USDA to fund broadband facility construction in “eligible rural communities.” Since 2003, the USDA has awarded $850 million in below-market-rate loans, with millions more in the pipeline.

In a June 18 letter to The Des Moines Register, USDA Under Secretary Thomas Dorr acknowledged that millions of taxpayers’ dollars are at stake, and that his agency has a responsibility to ensure the taxpayers are not saddled with bad loans.

The recent inspector general’s audit concluded that the broadband loan program has been plagued by lax procedures and vague criteria.

Rather than targeting rural, unserved areas as lawmakers intended, the USDA has given away the farm. The audit revealed that nearly 60 percent of the communities where low-interest loans were approved already had access to broadband services. Thus, tax dollars subsidized areas with no need, and enriched a few companies. Many communities were anything but “rural” — more than $100 million in loans went to communities adjacent to large cities.

It gets worse. In one example, the auditors found funds distributed to 19 subdivisions near Houston, Texas, with pricey homes and median household incomes approaching six figures. And, according to the audit, companies seeking federal loans and grants even went so far as to disguise their intended service areas by displaying photographs of other rural communities in the applications. In one case, a photograph of the same tower was attached to three different applications.

It seems clear that the USDA is granting low-cost government loans without properly investigating claims made in the loan applications or applying the kind of oversight that commercial banks routinely follow.

The USDA Inspector General recommended that no more loans be granted until the major program deficiencies its audit identified were fixed. Unfortunately, an agency of the USDA has ignored that recommendation and is rushing to disburse millions more.

Taxpayers deserve better. Quick action can and should be taken to fix the problems and prevent further misuse of taxpayer dollars.

— Thomas P. Graves, executive vice president, Iowa Cable and Telecommunications Association, Des Moines.
This blog has always kept up with the ripoff that "rural broadband" has become.

Both Senators Grassley and Harkin are big proponents of giving money away to questionable companies under the guise of providing rural broadband to areas that are already serviced by multiple providers. The companies getting all the free money from taxpayers are merely politically connected, so it's understandable that the other existing telcos and cable TV providers already providing services to customers are upset.

CIETC: The Curse Of Tom Vilsack



Iowa Workforce Development Director David Neil doesn't think much of the CIETC:
“I’m just going to be very blunt,” Neil told the CIETC board. “I think CIETC has lost the public confidence, and it’s time that, you know, we move forward and assure the public that things are done in a proper way.”

After the meeting, Neil said: “If they’ve lost the public confidence, they’ve lost my confidence. The effect of that, without me saying it, is that unless we see dramatic changes — and quickly — the Promise Jobs piece of the funding is going to go away.”

Beyond all the other financial problems the CIETC may have, blood-sucking and ass-fucking lawyers are milking the place dry:
Another concern is the agency’s growing stack of legal bills. The agency’s longtime attorney, Carlton Salmons, is billing CIETC $125 an hour . But because Salmons could end up being a witness in future litigation involving the agency, CIETC has hired another attorney, Jonathan Wilson, who bills CIETC at a rate of up to $260 an hour.
You remember Jonathan Wilson? He was the Des Moines School Board member who had been married, very publicly came out of the closet, and was not re-elected to his position back in 1995. Governor Tom Vilsack then tried to get Wilson appointed to state school board in 2004, but his nomination was rejected.

And golly gee, look who's defending the CIETC at $260 an hour:
Neil’s remarks about CIETC’s loss of public confidence prompted Wilson to defend the agency at Thursday’s board meeting.

“With all respect, there probably has been some loss of public confidence and credibility at (Workforce Development) ,” Wilson said, referring to that department’s failure to oversee spending at CIETC. “So there’s lots of that to go around. And if (Workforce Development) doesn’t do its proper role in the future, of supervision and oversight, and if CIETC doesn’t do that going forward, similar kinds of problems will surface all over again. And I believe the board has committed to cleaning up its act, getting its house in order, and setting things right and doing things right going forward.”
Trying to defend all these politically-inbred ass clowns is sort of like trying to defend the practice of letting the government come in, threaten to take your property for a pittance, and then give it to lawyer buddy who will reap millions or build a fancy home on a newly-created lake.

Besides, what does Iowa need all these agencies for anyway? Other than to keep Democrat kin employed? June unemployment figures come out this next week. As of May, Iowa's unemployment rate was 3.4%. Also, non-farm employment figures were the highest ever, and there were gains in the manufacturing sector.

Really, this is the curse of Tom Vilsack. Here's a guy who's got a really good economic situation in his state, but he can't enjoy it due to all these scandals.

Saturday, July 15, 2006

Iowa Politicians Who Want To Take Your Property Away And Give It To Big Corporations



From the Cedar Rapids Gazette
:
Cedar Rapids Mayor Kay Halloran, who attended the news conference in support of Vilsack's position, said the effect of today's expected override would be a chilling effect on development.

"It's going to mean that it will take longer and cost more, and some things won't get done that are conceptually very good if they override and the override is upheld," she said.
But who gives a fuck about people and their property, eh? Not Kay Halloran.

It's amazing that any politician would come out behind Vilsack on this one, unless they're a flaming Socialist or some connected lifetime Republicrat who thinks Government Knows Best. Or an unelected flunky who's brown-nosed their way to some chamber of commerce role. Talk about a suicide mission. All these turds need to be exposed and either voted out in their next re-election cycle or removed from a position of power.

Update: Here's another asshole:
“We’re disappointed in the legislators, but not surprised,” said Robin Anderson, executive director of the Mason City Area Chamber of Commerce.
And another:
“It’s still a bad bill for the state of Iowa,” said Dennis Lauver, president of the Clinton Area Chamber of Commerce.
And some people are just retarded:
“Some people see this as a great political opportunity to embarrass the governor,” said Senate Democratic Leader Mike Gronstal.
And then there are wafflers, like Johnston Republican Walt Tomenga:
...one of great things about House provides opportunity to listen to minority. I will give minority report. I stand in opposition (to override) not because I'm concerned about the many untintended consequences that we can perceive and not perceive. I'm not in oppoistion because I believe there's a better way, a better bill that we can produce. Let me share concerns about unintended consequences: e.d. an important tool in our democracy. States that the gfood of the majority at times and for necessary reasons need to prevail over the rights of the minority. That's been the case for years and years since the history of our country started. It's a delicate balanced because by it's nature it poses one entity against another. I find is unique that we use e.d. that we're upset and surprised that somebody finds it an abuse of power. I would be surprised if they didn't. It's taking something that somebody doesn't want to give so that the body politic can have a variety of things. I think one of unintend consequences is this bill destroys that balance. It will icnrease the cost of acquistion of private property. That doesn't sound like a bad deal if it's my property being acquired but going back to the common good purpose, that means all of us pay more for something we need. I'm concerned projects that are for the common good -- potable water for communities through reservoirs -- may be out of reach because of increased cost that goes beyond what is fair. I have no illusions that House will vote to override...but just think about what impact will be.
Really, Tomenga's only complaint is that it's going to possibly increase the cost of projects. Is that his only concern? Johnston, vote his ass out.

Or, as somebody commented at Krusty's:
Continue the eminent domain fight by fighting back at your city councils and chambers of commerce. These councils are largely populated by Democrats and they want to build things they can tax.

They are the drivers behind Vilsacks veto. Punish them too by voting them out.

War People Power
Actually, I think this commenter would be surprised how many Republicans on the various chambers of commerce around Iowa supported Vilsack's veto.

Friday, July 14, 2006

Boing Boing Finds The Hoosegow Honies



The State 29 blog is getting massive sloppy seconds from the Iowahawk Hoosegow Honey contest courtesy of this Boing Boing post.

I guess we started doing this Hoosegow Honey thing last year. I tried to get the gals recognized as a CILF, a term I proudly invented (Criminal I'd Like To F***), but Iowahawk's term prevailed.

I first noticed that the Polk County Jail in Des Moines put mug shots online last summer. Too bad I didn't use Flickr then, because all the old mug shots have disappeared.

If you want to search Polk County's Inmates On The Web, just click this link.

State Senate Veto Override Roundup

Kay Henderson's Radio Iowa blog has all the dirt:
Next, Lundby spoke and she talked about waiting for 40 days and the governor never once raised an objection about the bill with her, until he vetoed it. She said legislators weren't embarassing the governor, he was embarassing them by galavanting around this country and other countries and not talking to legislators about his concerns about the bill until it was too late -- and they'd put in months crafting the thing.

Her comments about the 40 day no-contact period raised the ire of Hatch and Quirbach, both of whom had to speak again and tell her they had been working with other people and the governor wasn't AWOL, etc. Most interesting that Gronstal didn't stand up to defend his governor from Lundby's rhetorical sally about being away running for president...

...Kreiman closed by praising the Iowans who put Democracy in action on this, writing letters, showing up and talking face-to-face with legislators about their concerns that cities and counties are running roughshod over property owners on certain projects. Kreiman told the folks in the gallery it was their action that brought about today's override.

Yes, Vilsack forgot about The People.

He seemed a hell of a lot more concerned with the special interests of private developers, most of whom usually turn out to be lawyers like he is.

Shame on the Des Moines Register, too. (Yepsen excluded). I'm sure the Register Editorial Board will be bitching tomorrow about the override.

Iowa Senate: 41-8 To Override

Radio Iowa, Political Forecast, and the Political Madman all have short comments.

Big story at Radio Iowa.

This is quite historic:
The last time the Iowa Legislature voted to override a governor's veto was in 1963.

Will Vilsack take it to court? I bet he does.

90-8

Vilsack's veto of anti-Kelo legislation is overridden by a vote of 90-8.

Ed Fallon:
Fallon: Rise to add my Democratic voice to this bipartisan effort. I'm sorry we're back but pleased to see a strong showing from the public. They feel very passionate about this issue...many have sacrificed to try to stick up for their property. What has frustrated me is when someone tells me there is no abuse of e.d. -- I've seen the faces. The threat of e.d. is as powerful as e.d. itslef. Compare it to the bully at school who threatens to beat you up for your lunch money. He gets the money without beating you up -- a little bit harsh, perhaps, but e.d. has been the bully. Let me be clear there is a rightful place for e.d. and condemnation. That's good. That's appropriate and that will continue. if we've done anything that needs to be fixed, next year legislators will fix. In 1999 we passed an e.d. bill that had a lot of problems in it -- the one bill I floor managed. it was exciting to me to work through the process but that bill was about 20 pages long. Hopefully you won't have a 20 page bill to fix this but I don't think you will. This is a compromise in a big way but gets to the heart of a lot of problems. Brought up in response to Kelo, but brewing in the background for a lot of years are issues that needed the spark that Kelo provided to get a fair hearing here. I'm really, really excited that we're finally getting around to doing that. This bill isn't perfect. It's a compromise. Hope changes are all with the idea of defending the little guy because this bill is about making sure little guy has a voice. I don't want to talk for too long. A lot of us who want to get out of here for lunch. Respect the time of those who've taken a day off. One person's here missing their kid's birthday. I think we're poised to do the right thing. Fallon talks about lot in his district. Roads are a public purpose, but there are some cases where a proposal for a new road has acted more on behalf of development interest than public interest. Let's vote to override this veto. There's some pain in doing that as a Democrat because those of us who are Ds have some respect for our governor, but this is the right thing to do.

Condemnation Without Representation

From a Radio Iowa report on the "Ordinary Iowans" rally at the Statehouse:
Lori Kirk of Madison County is concerned about a proposed lake that would submerge her home. "We're here today as property owners, not radicals, just simple people scared of losing our property," she said.

Dave Ryberg of Page County is fighting against having his farmland condemned for a lake near Shenandoah. "I'm a fourth generation family farmer. Farming is my business and my heritage and a way of life for my family and me," Ryberg says. "If this Page County lake project which is now proposed to be 6100 acres moves forward, I would lose two-thirds of my farm." He figures he'd lose three-quarters of his income in the process. Ryberg charges that the project is "condemnation without representation" because he does not live in Shenandoah and he says it's Shenandoah's City Council that's the driving force behind the lake.

A lake for the Osceola area is what Kathy Kelly is fighting. "There is no available ground in Clarke County like our acreage. Our home is irreplaceable. It is part of the farm my husband grew up on," Kelly says. "It's our American Dream. We did not even become aware that we were slated for condemnation until a year ago this month and then only verbally by a reservoir committee member with a conscience." Kelly made a direct appeal to lawmakers during a morning rally at the statehouse. "I ask you all to do only what you would have so done unto you because it may be you or someone you love who is under the gun in the future," Kelly said. "The indiscriminate use of eminent domain to take other's properties must be restricted now."

Steph Vos of Mahaska County is fighting to keep her farm from being seized to make way for an expansion of the Pella airport. Vos says they told the City of Pella they weren't willing to sell their land and were told the ground would be "forcibly taken" with the city's "eminent domain" power. During that morning rally at the statehouse, Vos issued this personal appeal to lawmakers to override the governor's veto of the property rights bill. "Today is my son's first birthday and where am I spending the day? Still fighting," Vos said. "Do the right thing. Override this veto."

Ouch.

Tom Vilsack Is Tired Of Having People Poke Him In The Nose



From the second installment of Kay Henderson's Radio Iowa liveblogging of the anti-Kelo veto override:
I'm back. I did a little chatting with Democrats just now, and they tell me their private 9:30 a.m. meeting with Governor Vilsack was tense. He "lectured" them that he (Vilsack) did stick up for the little guy and he was tired of having people poke him in the nose. (I heard about the nose poking from three and the lecture part from four.) It was a talk at them kind of moment. The Democrats I talked to say no one in the room talked back..
Last I saw, Vilsack was a lame duck, out of state most of the time, and polling fourth amongst Democrats when it came to possible candidates with presidential aspirations.

The Democrats might as well let Vilsack bitch at them. Like he's going anywhere in the future, except maybe to DC as some corporate lobbyist. Stick a fork in Vilsack, he's over, but he's quickly becoming a political pariah.

And I agree with the Political Forecast that Vilsack will use the "nuclear option" of a fight to the State Supreme Court over the state constitutionality of this legislative session. I don't think it's politically helpful for the Democratic Party, though, and it will be an awkward thing for Chet Culver's candidacy to deal with.

Steve King: Electric Fence Designer



From a transcript (and a video) of Steve King's comments posted on ThinkProgress.org:
...And so to just wrap up this construction, this’d be an example, then, of how that wall would look. Now you could also deconstruct it the same way. You could take it back down. If somehow they got their economy working and got their laws working in Mexico we could pull this back out just as easy as we could put it in. We could open it up again or we could open it up and let livestock run through there, whatever we choose.

I also say we need to do a few other things on top of that wall, and one of them being to put a little bit of wire on top here to provide a disincentive for people to climb over the top or put a ladder there. We could also electrify this wire with the kind of current that would not kill somebody, but it would simply be a discouragement for them to be fooling around with it. We do that with livestock all the time.

The comments are a fun read.

Meanwhile, the Senate has voted to not fund the construction of a border fence with Mexico after voting to authorize the construction of it.

Radio Iowa Liveblogging The Veto Override?

O. Kay Henderson at the Radio Iowa is trying to liveblog the anti-Kelo veto override today at the Iowa Legislature.

From her first entry:
At 8:30 am, Governor Vilsack held a news conference near downtown Des Moines to say what he's been saying for the past few weeks -- work with me, let's strike a compromise.

At 9 am, hundreds of people -- many from Madison County wearing white t-shirts decrying the lake project planned there -- stood in the statehouse rotunda as a few were called to the mic by Rep Jeff Kaufmann to tell their stories about how they're fighting government condemnation of their land for projects like an extension of the airport runway in Pella and lakes in Madison and Page Counties.

At this time there are still no high-speed lines available on press row in the House or Senate (they invited to the media to their party but didn't make accommodations for us to tell folks about it), so my plans to live blog from the floor during debate are probably shelled. I'm posting this from my computer in the statehouse press room on the ground floor (hooked up by DSL).
You don't really need a high-speed line in order to post text, but I understand her concern.

Remember, these are the same politicians who think printing off hundreds of pages of hand-written PDFs and scouring through them is a great way to track campaign contributions.

Rekha Basu Wants To Give Archie Brooks A Red Card



From Rekha Basu's column this morning in the Des Moines Register:
This is government out of touch with the people. It's making a mockery of concerns about ethics and wrongdoing at a time when the big challenge is voter apathy...

The council needn't go so far as to remove Brooks permanently, but it ought to at least put him on leave until questions are answered. A teacher accused of impropriety is put on leave. So is a police officer accused of a wrongful shooting.

Council member Christine Hensley says if Brooks were on leave, there would be no one to represent his district. There are no provisions in the Iowa Code for appointing someone to fill a temporary vacancy, according to William J. Sueppel, a municipal law attorney in Iowa City.

Still, having no one would be better than having someone people can't trust. The scandal is keeping some city residents from even contacting their elected official, notes Hensley. "We are not doing business as usual. Based on the impact I see it having on the city of Des Moines, I would hope he would do the respectful thing and step aside."

And if he doesn't?

A judge could rule to remove him, if residents of his district file a legal challenge. Pete Rose, the man behind the petition drive, has said that would be next. But that requires posting a bond, and the records needed in court are tied up in the criminal probes.

It's the city council's responsibility to stop acting like a good ol' boys club, more concerned with protecting its own than with doing what's right. It needs to deal with its own dysfunctional state.

She's 100% right, but I vote for tar and feathering by angry masses of people.

Thursday, July 13, 2006

"Recall that the last time the Democrats controlled Congress, they produced healthy budget surpluses"



In what has to be the biggest false revision of history ever, the Des Moines Register offers up this big fat lie in order to take a swipe at Republican Jeff Lameberti's criticism of Democrat Congressional incumbent Leonard Boswell:
Recall that the last time the Democrats controlled Congress, they produced healthy budget surpluses that put the country on a path toward paying down the national debt.

Just in case you missed it, here it is again, in bold:
Recall that the last time the Democrats controlled Congress, they produced healthy budget surpluses that put the country on a path toward paying down the national debt.

While I don't like Jeff Lameberti, and I knocked him around for his hubris on this issue a couple days ago, the Register Editorial Board's assertion that the last time the Democrats controlled Congress was a period of healthy budget surpluses is complete bullshit and an outright lie.

Republicans became the majority party in both the House of Representatives and the Senate after the 1994 elections. They've remained the majority party since then.

The Federal budget was in deficit from FY1969 until FY 1998. (PDF - source: Congressional Research Service, The Library Of Congress).

People can carp about whether it was Clinton's tax increase, the Republicans taking over Congress, or whether it was the result of decreasing interest rates, a booming economy, and a vastly expanded business climate thanks to computers and technology. That's a separate debate I don't care about.

The facts are that the last time the Democrats controlled Congress, in 1994, they were starting their 25th fiscal year of the Federal budget being in deficit. It was around $200 billion back then.



Nice lie, Register Editorial Board.

Meanwhile, I seem to recall Register sports columnist Nancy Clark's statement last year when bitching about bloggers:
Know that if the information is coming from the mainstream media - the accredited reporters, broadcasters and photojournalists - they are following strict professional guidelines that the looser outlets don't require. The information has been verified, has been scrutinized by editors, has been fact-checked and proofed.

Consider yourself fact-checked and proofed now.


Update: After reading this post, the Political Forecast admits that the Register Editorial Board is full of it.

I don't know if electing more Democrats is the answer, like the Political Forecast suggests. It really depends on the candidate. Lamberti is for a Balanced Budget amendment to the Constitution, which was the first item on the Contract With America in 1994 (it passed the House in 1995, but got killed in the Senate), but the BBA has that super-majority provision for times of war and such. Since the US always seems to be in Permanent War Mode, that's a big loophole that Congress might always be willing to jump through.

Still, Lamberti was stupid for trying to attack Boswell on matters of the Federal Budget. It's not like Boswell is an earmark kingpin, much less (cough, cough) Chairman of the House Budget Committee. Besides, whatever happened to Rock In Prevention scandal that Lameberti was involved with? Strange how that scandal disappeared.

The Race To The Bottom

From Radio Iowa:
The Republican candidate for governor says his Democratic opponent should be careful about using his state office to distribute ballots for the fall election.Chet Culver, the Democratic candidate, is Iowa's Secretary of State which means he's the state commissioner of elections...

...Nussle's campaign, though, says Culver has an "embarrassing track record" of running the Secretary of State's office in a "politically-motivated" way. For instance, in 2004 Culver waited for several days before declaring that President Bush had carried Iowa. "I happen to think that because the rest of the 50 states were able to figure it out, Iowa looked kind of silly,"...

...Congressman Jim Nussle, the G-O-P candidate, says Culver needs to tread carefully when it comes to sending out absentee ballots. "The concern that many people have is the last election (Culver) sent out at taxpayers' expense absentee ballots to Iowans, a typical job done by the parties," Nussle says...

...Culver's also been criticized for posting confidential information on the business section of the Secretary of State's website, data that was removed after the State Ombudsman threatened to issue a negative report on the situation...

...Culver campaign manager Patrick Dillon responded. "As badly as Congressman Nussle has mismanaged the federal budget while he's been in office, maybe he should spend more time focusing on his work than trying to tell Secretary Culver how to do his job," Dillon says...

...Dillon, meanwhile, says Congressman Nussle should refrain from using taxpayer dollars to send out newsletters to residents of Iowa's first congressional district...

Nice choices here: Bad or Worse.

And I'm not sure who's bad and who's worse.

Remember, you could have had Ed Fallon.

Yepsen: Archie Brooks Is A "Civic Extortionist"



David Yepsen sure hates Archie Brooks:
Iowa lawmakers gather Friday for a special session to consider an override of Gov. Tom Vilsack's veto of a bill strengthening the property rights of Iowans...

This bill also limits something else, and that's the ability of local politicians to threaten people with eminent domain. Often, just that is enough to prompt someone to sell. After all, you can't fight City Hall, right? And you get guys like Archie Brooks threatening East Village businesses with eminent domain because he doesn't like their storefronts. This bill would help limit such civic extortion.

Last September, Yepsen called Brooks a civic thug.

Yepsen's column is a welcome contrast to all the other Socialists on the Register Editorial Board who seem to be in favor of civic extortion.

Yepsen is also now blogging occasionally. His initial post from Monday is on the eminent domain issue. He's also accepting comments.

Why Iowa Should Have The Death Penalty



Meet Troy Bresley. 6' 5" tall. 300 pounds.

From the Des Moines Register
:
Police said Troy Bresley, 34, walked into the police station Tuesday night and admitted that he had killed his girlfriend, Tracy Davis, 32.

She was found under a blanket in the couple's east-side apartment, dead from multiple stab wounds, police said.

Two of the three children who lived with the couple were home when the slaying happened, police said...

Police said Bresley admitted that he had thought recently about killing Davis, with whom he had what a relative described as a rocky two-year relationship.
Luckily, both Democrat Chet Culver and Republican Jim Nussle are in favor of bringing back the death penalty in Iowa.


Update: Side Notes has a quieter take.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Jim Ross Nussle Wants Taxpayer Refund Accounts For Iowa

From Radio Iowa:
Republican candidate Jim Nussle is promising to create an "Iowa Taxpayer Refund Account" if he's elected governor. Under current law, excess state tax revenues are deposited in a rainy day savings account for emergencies, but Nussle wants to appoint a new commission to come up with ways to return a portion of that to taxpayers.

"So that 30 percent of that surplus will be set aside for the purpose of allowing that Tax Commission to look for reforms to provide relief to taxpayers," Nussle says. "It could be in the form of property tax. It could be in the form of income tax."

...If such an Iowa Taxpayer Refund Account had been in place for the past three years, Nussle says there would be about 150-million dollars in it now.
Across the border in Missouri, they have this thing called the Hancock Amendment in the state's constitution, which limits state revenue to a certain percentage of some figure. If revenue goes over that figure, corporations and individuals who pay state income taxes get a refund. Nearly a billion dollars was given back between 1995 and 1999, but the politicians have tried to nuke it with court challenges and loopholes over the years.

Such a thing like the Hancock Amendment would never fly in Iowa. The Legislature would simply never allow it. They've become too addicted to spending down things like the Rainy Day Fund and wanting to bond out corporate welfare.

As for Nussle's proposal, it's probably not the worst idea out there, except for the fact that it will create more and more government workers in order to administer. Beyond that, I can't see it ever passing.

How Stupid Does The AP Think We Are?



I don't have a physical copy of the Des Moines Register today. They're kind of difficult to come by here in the Cow Town. Plus, this story came out last night so it might take another day to hit the papers even though it's on the wire services right now.

The story I'm referring to is Robert Novak's admission:
I learned Valerie Plame's name from Joe Wilson's entry in Who's Who in America

My guess is that the Register will run the Pete Yost version on the Associated Press wire. It goes starts off like this:
Columnist Robert Novak said publicly for the first time Tuesday that White House political adviser Karl Rove was a source for his story outing the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame.
Surprisingly, there's no mention of Novak learning Plame's name from Who's Who in the Pete Yost/AP story.

Joseph Wilson's 1999 entry in Who's Who is pictured at the top of this post.

Rekha Basu has gone on about the "leaking" of Plame's name for years, as have countless Register letter to the editor writers.

My money is on the Register printing the Pete Yost/AP story.

Why bother running Novak's admission in full? It would make the moonbats and liars look bad, even though anybody has been able to walk into most larger libraries, request an older copy of Who's Who, turn the page to Joseph Wilson, and see Valerie Plame's name right there.

How stupid do they think we are?

Don't forget that Iowa-based Associated Press reporter Mike Glover, the guy who can't get his quotes straight before sending them out on the wire, wrote a propaganda piece about the "leak" issue with an Evan Bayh angle last October.


Update: The Political Forecast doesn't get it. Valerie Plame's name was in Who's Who under Joesph Wilson IV's entry as early as 1999. How do you get into Who's Who? You submit your biography or you nominate a collegue. To omit all of this, like Pete Yost, Mike Glover, and Evan Bayh-Curious do, is being disingenuous.

Biodiesel Is Better Than Ethanol



There have been a lot of news stories on the research published on recently by the University of Minnesota concerning energy gains and environmental impacts of ethanol and biodiesel. The original news release is located here.

Green Car Congress has a good post about it all. The people commenting on the report have even more interesting things to say.

If you read this blog with any regularity, then you know how I feel about things like E85 and the push by government idiots from both parties to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars pushing a fuel that nobody will ever buy.

Citizen Pork

Ted Townsend's at it again.

From the Des Moines Register:
Iowa businessman Ted Townsend will contribute $1 million to kick off fundraising for a new U.S. Center for Citizen Diplomacy that would be headquartered in Des Moines, it is expected to be announced here today...

Schodde said that business plans are far from firm, but it's envisioned that the center eventually could have a budget of $9 million a year. That would involve private and government money.

Under discussion is whether the center eventually could become an authorized federal entity, similar to the U.S. Institute of Peace, an independent and nonpartisan organization established and paid for by Congress...
There's also a related op-ed on the editorial page today by John Menzies and Harriet Mayor Fulbright.

Even after reading both the Townsend article and the Menzies/Fulbright op-ed, I can't figure out what the hell this Citizen Diplomacy thing is all about.

Sounds to me like it's another potential ripoff of the Federal taxpayers that's given away to a bunch of busybodies who've appointed themselves as ambassador to whatever pet project or resort-laden country they can find. In other words, they're leeches.

Like It's Ever Gonna Happen



From the Des Moines Register:
City officials in Dallas, Polk and Warren counties have begun to put together plans on how they will spend an estimated $25 million that would be generated from an sales-tax increase to 7 percent.

The money is about one-third of the estimated $80 million the sales tax is expected to generate in the tri-county region. Shoppers in those counties would pay an extra penny per dollar on most things they buy as part of a plan by civic leaders called "Project Destiny" to build more recreation trails and boost metro-area cultural attractions.

The remainder of the money, according to a regional agreement that leaders from 48 cities and counties have been asked to sign, will go toward property-tax reduction and to a regional authority to distribute to attractions, arts and cultural opportunities in Central Iowa.

City leaders in the Des Moines area have said they would spend the money on new recreation/community centers, expanded library hours, enhanced public safety services, water treatment facilities and roads.
Des Moines sure is messed up, isn't it?

You know, Terry Braindead and the Iowa Legislature upped Iowa's sales tax from 3% to 4% in 1983. Then they hiked it from 4% to 5% in 1992. That's a 60% rise in the sales tax in 9 years.

Gambling has proliferated all over Iowa in the past 20 years. Prairie Meadows, the horse track and later the casino, was going to pave the streets and brick the schools in Polk County with gold!

Then in 1999, Des Moines residents agreed to an additional 1% local option sales tax for school improvements. Ever since then, schools have just closed rather than be improved. But Eric Witherspoon was the greatest Stupidertendent Des Moines ever had! Boo hoo!

Now a bunch of politically-connected lawyers and executives want to make the Des Moines area more "competitive" screw the people even harder.

Have they not learned anything from all the corrupt civic thugs and rubber stamps involved with the CIETC scandal?

The bone of property tax reduction won't be believed. They've tried that too many times before. It's all a lie, anyway.

What's left? Pitching that Des Moines is just a recreational center or bike trail away from nirvana?

Bull.

I predict that Project Density, or whatever the hell these tone-deaf "leaders" are proposing, will be rejected by at least 80% of voters.

I also predict that, despite massive lobbying by the media and their friends the politicians, the 2009 "extension" of the 1% local option sales tax for school improvements will go down to defeat.

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

That's Why They Call Him LAMEberti



Democrats should savor, relish, and fully exploit Republican Jeff Lameberti's trip-up when trying to pin blame on runaway Federal spending on his Congressional opponent, incumbent Leonard Boswell, rather than US House Budget Committee Chairman and Iowa Republican gubernatorial candidate Jim Ross Nussle.

Great job supplying us junkies the dirt, Radio Iowa blog.

Whatever Happened To Erin Buzuvis?



You remember the now-former University of Iowa adjunct law professor Erin Buzuvis?

Last year, she disliked the pink walls and urinals in the opposing men's football locker room at Kinnick Stadium and said "Pink is regarded as the color of little girls or the color of effeminate men."

All this was based on some cherry-picking and quoting out-of-context of beloved former Hawkeye football coach Hayden Fry's comments in his biography: "pink walls would put opponents in a passive mood" and "some consider it a sissy color." Fry had the opposing locker rooms painted pink in the early 1980s, and the tradition continued after a major renovation a few years ago.

Buzuvis seemed to ignore the fact that Fry earned a degree in psychology and knew something about the use of the color pink, much less his past history at integrating football teams some 40 years ago. Fry was no dumb jock goombah.

Buzuvis's big problem was that she voiced her problems with the pink locker rooms in her blog, which has been subsequently removed, and allowed people to comment anonymously. This resulted in some nasty things said by idiots and the eventual 15 minute-long media uproar.

Buzuvis stayed low for the rest of the year, except for following through on trying to challenge the use of the color in the locker room via the NCAA, but that went nowhere.

Today she is back in the safe confines under the left wing of the East Coast. She'll be teaching property and sports law at Western New England College.

Perhaps Ms Buzuvis will take in some men's football games this year. The Golden Bears are Western New England's men's football team.

Gold, of course, has been long associated with wealth, prestige, royalty, imperialism, slavery, and heterosexual wedding anniversaries.

Maybe that will give Professor Buzuvis something to mine while living in the Commonwealth.

Small Businessmen... Like William "Kum" Krause



From the Des Moines Register:
The largest owner of the Iowa Lottery’s now-defunct TouchPlay devices filed a lawsuit today against the state for breach of contract over the recently enacted ban of the slot machine-like games...

Royal Financial, a West Des Moines company tied to the convenience store chain called Kum & Go, filed suit claiming that Ed Stanek, the lottery’s chief executive, personally asked company owner William Krause to get involved in the TouchPlay program.

“Dr. Stanek stated he needed one private party to take the lead and purchase one thousand (TouchPlay devices) in order to make the TouchPlay program viable. Without such a purchase, the entire TouchPlay program could fail. He requested that Krause be that party,” the lawsuit filed this afternoon said.

“... The Lottery Authority represented to Royal Financial that the TouchPlay program would last for a minimum five-year period, that Royal Financial would recoup its investment and expenses.”

State officials declined comment beyond saying they were reviewing the suit.
I'm just guessing here. Pure speculation..

Two parts.

First, I think this lawsuit won't go anywhere. Krause and The Gang surely knew what they were getting into, but

Secondly, I think "Doctor" Ed Stanek is going to be out of a job within the year after Krause and his lawyers air all the "blue sky" promises Stanek might have allegedly made.

Let the mud dragging begin!

Monday, July 10, 2006

Pierre "I Got Your F***ing Laptop" Pierce Might Get Paroled Early



From the Des Moines Register:
Former Iowa Hawkeye basketball player Pierre Pierce cleared a major hurdle today toward being granted parole after serving eight months in prison for assaulting and terrorizing his former girlfriend.

The Iowa Board of Parole, meeting at the Mt. Pleasant Correctional Facility, voted 3-0 to grant parole to Pierce. However, because he is considered a high-risk offender, he still needs affirmative votes from two other parole board members. That decision is expected within 30 days.

The board refused to approve Pierce's request to be paroled to Iowa City, concluding he should be with his family in the Chicago suburb of Westmont, Ill. The board said he may not have contact with his victim and he must participate in a sex offender after-care program...

Parole board members grilled Pierce about the details of the January 2005 incident in West Des Moines and expressed dissatisfaction with many of his responses to their questions. But the board members said they plan to parole him because he is due to discharge his sentence in September and they want him to be under correctional supervision in the community.

Which reminds me of:
Fallon: ARE WE GOING TO DECLARE ALL OF IOWA A SEX OFFEND --

Yepsen: WHY NOT?

Fallon: SEX-OFFENDER-FREE ZONE?

Yepsen: WHAT'S WRONG WITH SUGGESTING TO THESE PEOPLE THAT THEY LEAVE IOWA?

Time to go, Pierre. And take your f***ing laptop with you.

In Case You Didn't Already Know It, Dick Cheney's Daughter Is A Lesbian



Mike Glover, based in Iowa and of the Associated Press, shouts it from the rooftops in his first paragraph:
Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee is optimistic his legislature will quickly reinstate a ban on same sex couples serving as foster parents, conceding that it would prevent Vice President Dick Cheney's daughter from serving in that role...
Glover doesn't say who asked that question. Maybe it was John Kerry?

What's the point of mentioning Dick Cheney's daughter (Mary Cheney), anyway? Is it because her dad is a Republican, like Huckabee, and she just happens to be a lesbian?

Besides, Mary Cheney doesn't even live in Arkansas. She lives in Colorado.

Six paragraphs later, out of the blue and unrelated to the main point of the story, Glover has to mention it again:
Cheney has a lesbian daughter, a fact he has been public with. That issue was raised in the last presidential campaign.
Raised?

More like Dick Cheney and his daughter's sexuality were desperately dragged into the campaign by John Kerry during the final days.


Related: Mike Glover Of The Associated Press Screwed Up

Where's My Free Shit?

From the Daily Idiot, a university rag in Iowa City, a point/counterpoint by Jayne Lady & Jake Bender:
Seattle's new apartment complex that gives free, permanent shelter to homeless people, no strings attached, has critics fuming. They argue it's hopelessly expensive, as well as unfair, to hand out homes for nothing...

By supplying free apartments, cities can actually save money. A chronic alcoholic who is left on the streets may be picked up by the police and brought to the emergency room dozens of times per year, costing the city thousands of dollars. In his article "Million-Dollar Murray," New Yorker columnist Malcolm Gladwell described a homeless man in Reno who cost the city more than $1 million. As satisfying as it may feel to deride the Seattle program as just a handout, other cities are already giving the homeless a huge handout. It's just not a very helpful one.

Although every effort should be made to help people combat their alcohol or drug problems, we should recognize they will need a place to live regardless of their problems. The uncomfortable reality is some of these people cannot or will not stop drinking or using drugs. To make sobriety a condition of having shelter is tantamount to turning them out on the street.
So.... alcoholics and drug addicts should be given free apartments courtesy of the taxpayers, regardless of how messed up they are?

It's always entertaining to read the words of young and dumb far-out liberals. They're the kind of people who have compassion for all the sociopathic debris in the world, yet they wouldn't dare spend a second at some place like the Door Of Faith Mission in Des Moines, a place that actually gets homeless alcoholics and drug addict help. God forbid that studying religion, much less demanding sobriety, be a requirement of getting a roof over one's head or a life back on track.

By the way, Jayne Lady is one of those people who thinks children should be passed from grade-to-grade and allowed to participate in sports as long as they get four D-minuses and a single F.

Related: Al Gore's National Example

Bruce Braley Thinks People Are Stupid



Iowa Ennui whacks Bruce Braley on the issue of Social Security reform.

It's no big surprise that Braley calls Social Security a trust fund on his web site.

How stupid does Braley think people are these days?

Social Security is nothing more than a Ponzi Scheme that takes money from people paying into it right now and pays it out to current recipients.

What is that trust fund money invested in, Braley? That's right, US Treasury Bonds.

Know what bonds are, Braley? Debt.

So what does it take to unlock the zillions in the trust fund, Braley? More money.

How do you get that money, Braley? Are you going to raid everybody's 401K accounts?

Gee whiz, is this the best the Democrats in Iowa could come up with? A demagogue?

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Des Moines Register Editorial Board Embraces Civic Thuggery



Today the Register Editorial Board urges Iowa lawmakers, in their special session coming up this Friday concerning Eninem's Domain, to reach a compromise concerning anti-Kelo legislation that Governor Tom Vilsack vetoed.

What sort of compromise is possible when the bill passed the Iowa House 89-5 and the Iowa Senate 43-6?

Here's the crux of the Register's opinion:
Exercising the power of eminent domain is always the last option, but there are times when it is necessary, whether for a highway project, a public-recreation area or a downtown-redevelopment project that benefits the entire community with a growing economy and tax base. Those decisions should be made at the local level, not in the Legislature in Des Moines for all 99 counties and 950 communities. Leaders in those communities know best what is needed, and if they abuse the power, the voters have the power to remove them.
Basically, the Register Editorial Board embraces corrupt civic thugs who want to put funky record shops out of business in favor of creating McEast McVillages so that some politically-connected lawyer from Urbandale can clean up.

Nice job sticking it to the little guy, Register!

Saturday, July 08, 2006

A Taxing Question For The Des Moines Register

From the Des Moines Register Editorial Board:
According to a new report from Citizens for Tax Justice, based in Washington, 99 percent of Iowans end up losing ground as a result of federal tax cuts and deficits. Between 2001 and 2006, the tax break for a middle-income Iowan was $2,011. Yet that person's share of the added national debt burden was $9,173 or nearly $30,000 for a family of four, the report found.

Tax breaks financed by deficit spending are no break at all.
The Des Moines Register Editorial Board and the Citizens For Tax Increases must be assuming that 100% of Iowans are paying Federal taxes.

Not true.

According to 2006 Tax Foundation estimates, 29% of Iowans filing tax returns will have zero or negative Federal tax liability.

Imagine how many more pay just a very small percentage of their income in Federal income taxes.

Also from the Tax Foundation
:
During 2006, Tax Foundation economists estimate that roughly 43.4 million tax returns, representing 91 million individuals, will face a zero or negative tax liability. That's out of a total of 136 million federal tax returns that will be filed. Adding to this figure the 15 million households and individuals who file no tax return at all, roughly 121 million Americans—or 41 percent of the U.S. population—will be completely outside the federal income tax system in 2006.1 This total includes those who pay no tax, and those who pay some tax upfront and are later refunded the full amount of the tax paid or more.

Who Are the Non-Payers?

Using IRS data, we are able to create a profile of these individuals who are outside the federal income tax system. As Table 1 shows, those who file as single or head-of-household are much more likely to be non-payers. One-third of single filers pay nothing in federal income taxes, and almost two-thirds of those who file as head of household pay nothing. In contrast, just 22 percent of married filers are non-payers.

Why do many single filers face zero tax liability? One reason is that single filers tend to be younger and earn lower incomes than married filers—especially single parents who file as head-of-household. As a result, married taxpayers pay roughly 75 percent of all federal income taxes, despite filing only 40 percent of returns.
Since so many young, single, and poorer people don't pay any Federal taxes anyway, or the fact that poorer people are reaping benefits from things like the Earned Income Tax Credit, I guess it doesn't really matter to them if the deficit and National Debt keep growing. Right? They don't pay anything. Why should they care?

From the Heritage Foundation:
...the accusation that poor families are shouldering more of the tax burden while receiving less of the spending is empirically false. From 1979 through 2003, the total federal tax bur­den on the highest-earning quintile (one-fifth or 20 percent) of Americans—who earn 52 percent of all income—rose from 56 percent to 66 percent of all taxes. Their share of individual income taxes jumped from 65 percent to 85 percent. On the spending side, antipoverty spending has leaped from 9.1 percent of all federal spending in 1990 to a record 16.3 percent in 2004.
Why would the Socialists on the Register Editorial Board bother with anything like facts? Right? They have statistics to manipulate for their own political benefit!

What's ironic is that the Register depends upon advertising revenue from mostly rich people in order to survive. Why these advertisers continue to support a newspaper that is openly hostile to rich people, lower tax rates, and the truth about who's paying taxes, is beyond my comprehension.

Update: Then there's this from the New York Times today:
An unexpectedly steep rise in tax revenues from corporations and the wealthy is driving down the projected budget deficit this year, even though spending has climbed sharply because of the war in Iraq and the cost of hurricane relief.

On Tuesday, White House officials are expected to announce that the tax receipts will be about $250 billion above last year's levels and that the deficit will be about $100 billion less than what they projected six months ago. The rising tide in tax payments has been building for months, but the increased scale is surprising even seasoned budget analysts and making it easier for both the administration and Congress to finesse the big run-up in spending over the past year.

Tax revenues are climbing twice as fast as the administration predicted in February, so fast that the budget deficit could actually decline this year...

Corporate tax payments are expected to exceed $300 billion, up from $131 billion three years ago. The other big increase is an extraordinary jump in individual taxes that were not withheld from paychecks, usually a reflection of taxes on investment income and executive bonuses.

The jump in receipts is providing Mr. Bush and Republicans in Congress with a new opportunity to assert that tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 are working and that Congress should make them permanent.

Pat Toomey, president of the Club for Growth, a conservative political fund-raising group, said: "The supply-siders were absolutely right. All the major sources of revenue have grown, especially in areas where we said they would."

...Government spending under Mr. Bush continued to climb rapidly this year, more than twice as fast as the economy.
Spending growth is the big problem. Just ask Tom Vilsack, who appears to have failed math class. So is all the pork that fauxscal conservative Chuck Grassley allows. And then there's Jim Ross Nussle's problem.

Friday, July 07, 2006

"Ethanol Prices Are Killing E85"

Want more proof that E85 is going to be a disaster as a taxpayer-supported fuel by states?

This is from the Columbus (Nebraska) Telegram:
The state's [Nebraska] flexible fuel vehicles are the only consumers of E85 fuel in Columbus, which is priced about $2.80 per gallon - for supplies that have been on hand since April.

If E85 were purchased based on today's wholesale prices, the price at the pump would be about $3.60 per gallon.

Because of the high cost of ethanol and vehicles receiving lower mileage with the fuel, the flow of E85 has slowed to a drip a year after three area stations installed the pumps...

Jeff Johnson, general manager of Sapp Bros.' Sinclair, 4300 23rd St., said when the pumps were opened last July he hoped the station would be one of the first to offer an innovative and lucrative product. When the pumps opened the price for E85 was set at $1.899, but since then pure ethanol has increased by $2.30 a gallon, more than double the price a year ago...

“Since we have gotten into the E85 business, ethanol has gone through the roof,” he said. “Ethanol prices are killing E85.”

White Star in Albion and AJ's C Store in Duncan, both owned by John Sellhorst, installed E85 pumps in April and June 2005, respectfully.

Sellhorst said ethanol prices have hurt sales to the point that he has not ordered E85 since April, when a price boom occurred...

Phyllis Stopak, manager of AJ's, said E85 sales were extremely slow.

“I don't think we have sold any in the month of June,” Stopak said.

Joan Sokol, manager of White Star, said there were no sales of E85 last week, and less than 20 gallons were sold the week before.

“People won't pay higher prices to get less gas mileage,” Sokol said, except for state vehicles.

Johnson said he also noticed a trend of state vehicles being the primary consumers of E85 fuel.

“The sad part is the only people we are selling to are government entities,” he said.
$3.60 a gallon for government E85 fleets based on current prices is a bad deal. Considering that burning E85 results in a 30% drop in efficiency, to get the same miles as a 100% gasoline-fuelled car you'd have to spend almost $4.70 a gallon for E85.

The current price for a gallon of 100% gas in Columbus, Nebraska is $2.75.

E85 is a ripoff.

What's amazing is that this is basically the only recent newspaper article that fully spells out the truth about E85's problems in the market, and it came out over a week ago. And I bet almost nobody's read it because who's ever heard of the newspaper in Columbus, Nebraska?

Even the Des Moines Register's story this past week about E10's recent price increases played dumb.

Meanwhile, Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack wants to spend $180 million of taxpayer dollars pushing E85 onto gas stations and owners of FFV-capable vehicles while Detroit automakers push E85-capable engines instead of offering hybrids or common-rail diesels in order to game CAFE standards.

E85 is an expensive taxpayer ripoff with wheels currently in motion. What are you going to do to stop it?


Related: Iowa Starts E85 Pump Grants and Iowa Starts E85 Pump Grants, Part 2

Powerless And Stupid



This speaks for itself. From the Des Moines Register:
Nancy Walker still has headaches and earaches from a June 28 close call when carbon monoxide from a generator almost killed her and her Des Moines family.

But an even bigger headache is how she and her family are going to pay their $3,075 MidAmerican Energy bill to get the power restored to their home near the Iowa State Fairgrounds...
A $3075 energy bill? How many years of non-payment is that?
Allan Urlis, spokesman for MidAmerican Energy, said the average natural gas bill jumped to $803 for the period of October 2005 through April of this year...
Looks like the Walkers are also a bunch of deadbeats:
"I'm behind in the rent, too, but thank God the landlord is understanding about that," a tearful Nancy Walker said Wednesday. "At some point, I suppose we could be evicted."
How much could the rent be? It's a 2 bedroom and 1 bathroom house with 936 square feet on the East Side. The tax assessor's web site has the house valued at $60,000.

And how many people stay there?
On June 28, Walker and nine other people sleeping in her house nearly died of carbon monoxide poisoning.
Tom Alex, the "reporter" who wrote this article in the Des Moines Register, can't resist editorializing:
The problem is not only the high cost of energy, but also rising costs of milk, gasoline and vegetables. Low-income families' financial struggles increase as prices rise through inflation.
That's unnecessary commentary.

Besides, milk's what? $2.50 a gallon?

They live at 2952 East Grand, so do they really need a car? A bus goes by their house all day long.

And vegetables are expensive due to inflation? Tom Alex must be smoking something.

Numbers vs Data



From Radio Iowa:
The number of fatalities on Iowa's Interstates has increased in the past year.

The posted speed limit on most miles of four-lane, divided highways in Iowa was raised to 70 miles an hour on July 1st of last year. In the first 12 months under that higher speed limit, there were 48 fatal traffic deaths on the Interstates. In the previous 12-month period, there were 41.

Iowa State Highway Patrol spokesman Jim Saunders says it's too early to tell whether increase in fatalities had anything to do with the hike in the speed limit. "The 70 mile an hour speed limit is only on selected stretches of rural Interstate and a number of these accidents occured on stretches of Interstate where the speed limit didn't increase," Saunders says. "It's also very feasible that these fatalities could have occured for other reasons such as drivers being intoxicated and people not wearing their seatbelt."
This blog kept track of some interstate fatality data for a while. Last November there were a lot of cars crossing the median, people standing on the interstates getting whacked, and unlucky people on ice-covered roads.

Last year, the Register was complaining about the rise in the speed limit while not bothering to look into the data.

You can look at overall numbers, but that's really lazy.

Why not set up some Google News alerts and track it yourself? I-80, I-35, I-29, and I-380. That should cover it.

Here's a crash reported on June 19th from I-35:
The Iowa State Patrol says 80 year old Amparo Chavez of El Salvador was killed when the driver of an SUV lost control after a wheel came loose.

Eight other people from Storm Lake were also in the vehicle when it rolled.

Thursday, July 06, 2006

EarthPork Update

From the Iowa Pork Forest web site today:
I'm not sure how Pella could come up with the money for EarthPork without a casino to supply the dough, unless they're planning on trafficking cocaine or winning the European International Lottery every month for the next 26 years.

Iowa Starts E85 Pump Grants, Part 2

From a reader:
Your blog is one of my required daily readings and I appreciate the effort you put into it.

Today's "Iowa Starts E85 Pump Grants" you tell of ethanol being higher priced than gasoline saying , "This is going to be a gigantic disaster." The higher price of ethanol is going to be a short term problem.

I am one of the farmers who put money into the ethanol plant at Lakota, IA and voted to give 60% control to Global Ethanol of Australia last spring. At the information meeting it was pointed out right now there is a billion gallon ethanol shortage. There is two billion gallons of ethanol coming on line in the next year between new plants and expansion of existing plants. That means in a year we will have a billion gallons of surplus ethanol and we would be in the position of exporting ethanol, probably to southeast Asia where demand is growing.
Thanks for the additional information.

I should probably clarify my opinion concerning ethanol and E85.

I think ethanol production is generally good for Iowa farmers, even if it involves insane amounts of corporate welfare and tax breaks. It is good to see that nasty MTBE stuff eliminated as an oxygenate and ethanol used as a replacement, but there are some problems lurking on the horizon.

If corn remains $2 a bushel and the cost of creating a gallon of ethanol remains around $1.35, then we might see a backlash against ethanol producers if a gallon of hooch keeps selling for $4. It won't take long for some politician from a non-farm state to start ranting about the "windfall profits" of ethanol producers and threatening to take away the tax incentives that makes US production possible and remove tariffs that prevent massive importation of cheap ethanol from Brazil.

In other words, if you're a farmer and you're investing a lot of money in an ethanol production plant, better make sure the politicians don't pull a Touchplay Slottery Machine bait-and-switch and sell you out to the Poor Farm.

The problem I have is the government pushing E85 on the public and spending hundreds of millions of tax dollars in order to do it.

E85 is a commodity. Even if ethanol production vastly increases and the current price decreases, E85 will never cost any less than 20% to 30% below conventional gasoline (20% to 30% is the fuel efficiency loss of E85 compared to 100% gasoline).

If ethanol demand remains high, then the price of E85 will remain high. If E85 is priced higher than 100% gasoline, nobody will buy it except government fleet vehicles like Vilsack's 11 mpg Chevy Tahoe FFV. There might be a wealthy farmer, politician, or member of the Corn Promotion Board who will pose for TV news cameras in front of an E85 pump, but that will be it.

If governments and taxpayers are going to be pushing fuels, it should be bio-diesel and not E85. Diesel engines get better mileage, period. Toyota sells a small pickup in Europe with a common-rail direct injection turbodiesel engine that gets 34 mpg. And ask anybody who owns a VW TDI about mileage in the mid 40's. As for emissions, bio-diesel complies with the Clean Air Act.

It's not like bio-diesel is something that farmers can't make money on.

The problem is the automakers. They don't want to put diesel engines in their cars for the US market. They'd rather go the easy route by making their gasoline engines E85 compatible and game the system in order to subvert CAFE standards. And the automotive press constantly reminds readers of the problems with Detroit's diesels in the late 70s and early 80s. Well, things have changed. And automakers sell a lot of diesels overseas, especially in Europe where 60% of passenger vehicles have diesel engines, so it's not like they don't know.

The US could probably end dependence on foreign oil tomorrow if most passenger cars and trucks were plug-in electric/bio-diesel engine hybrids. It's possible that such an engine combination could get well over 100 mpg. But why do that?


Update: Mitsubishi Fuso, owned by DaimlerChrysler, is creating a diesel-electric hybrid delivery truck with 30% better mileage.

Iowa Starts E85 Pump Grants



From the Des Moines Register:
The number of Iowa retailers that offer E85 will grow as automakers plan to boost production of vehicles that can burn fuel blended with 85 percent ethanol, industry experts said Wednesday.

The Iowa Renewable Fuels Association also announced it will award $300,000 in grants to increase the number of pumps where E85 is available...

The grants come after lawmakers this spring approved $13 million over three years to install E85 tanks. Shaw said he expects demand to increase.

“I really think over the next three years we could do 500 stations, and it could be double that,” he said.

There are roughly 2,700 gasoline retailers in the state, and if that prediction is realized, availability of E85 would be enough for more people to buy flex-fuel vehicles, officials said.

Do the politicians really think Iowans are going to put $4 a gallon-equivalent cornholio fuel into their GMs and Fords?

Just wait until the sales don't happen. Iowans will then be berated by politicians and the media for not ponying up and setting an example.

This is going to be a gigantic disaster.

Related: E-85-ing Around The Midwest: "The Price Was Ugly" and E10 Price Rise Finally Noted In The Des Moines Register

Tom "Rubber Stamp" Vlassis's Wife Has Deep Denial Issues



Marc Hansen tries his best to rehabilitate Tom "Rubber Stamp" Vlassis's reputation in this rather obsequious interview in today's Des Moines Register.

Even funnier is Vlassis's wife, Sophie, who appears to be in deep denial by over-defending her "Rubber Stamp" hubby to the point of complete embarrassment.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Seizure Relapse



A couple days ago I mentioned the Register Editorial Board's infamous Seizure op-ed.

In it was this:
1. The Bush administration has been secretly monitoring phone records, e-mails, Internet traffic and international banking transactions in search of information about terrorists and anyone who might be remotely connected with terrorist activity.
To which they concluded:
8. If these programs continue unchallenged, all future presidents will be free to spy on Americans in ways never envisioned by the founders. The excuse is that we are at war against terrorism. But it is not a war as is commonly understood, where liberties are temporarily sacrificed until hostilities end. The world has always confronted terrorism to some extent, and it always will. We should not sacrifice cherished American liberties forever, however. And so long as we still have a Constitution, it should be enforced.
You know how the Register gets their marching orders from papers such as the New York Times? Check out this post from Villainous Company concerning backpedaling and hypocrisy by the Times. And don't miss the Chuck Grassley quote from last November towards the end of the article.

If everybody knew about the "secret" program, how come Chuck "Pimp Tax" Grassley didn't? How come Eric Lichtblau didn't?

To once again quote super-sized Register sports columnist Nancy Clark last year concerning bloggers vs newspaper reporters:
Know that if the information is coming from the mainstream media - the accredited reporters, broadcasters and photojournalists - they are following strict professional guidelines that the looser outlets don't require. The information has been verified, has been scrutinized by editors, has been fact-checked and proofed.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!!!!

Another Reason Why Ethanol Is Being Hyped

From Jeff McIntire-Strasberg at Treehugger:
David Roberts at Gristmill may have well summed up all of our responses to the news that Ford Motor Co. is moving away from recent "keen interests" in hybrid technology, and choosing to focus on "flex-fuel" vehicles: WTF? During the taping of the most recent theWatt Podcast today, host Ben Kenney came across a line in the New York Times' article on this development that may hold the key: "Car companies receive a credit for each vehicle they produce that is capable of running on ethanol or a similar bio-fuel." Did you know that? We certainly didn't.

It turns out that Alternative Motor Fuels Act of 1988, which was renewed as the Alternative Fueled Vehicles Rule of 2004, does just that. According to the US Department of Energy's Alternative Fuels Data Center, these laws create an incentive for auto makers to build cars capable of using alternative fuels by "[giving] a credit of up to 1.2 mpg toward an automobile manufacturer's average fuel economy which helps it avoid penalties of the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards." The Union of Concerned Scientists calculates that this results in a "...roughly a 65 percent bonus in credited fuel economy" (see their table for exact figures). While Ford denies this credit played a role in its decision, it is clear that cars running on biofuels automatically raise the company's corporate average fuel economy. While hybrids would help here, too, almost any car in Ford's fleet can be made a flex-fuel model with relatively simple modifications, while hybrids would require major new investment in the manufacturer's infrastructure.

Of course, developing cars with flex-fuel capacity could be a major step towards reducing automobile emissions, but the key here is the "flex" part of the equation: if a driver has plain old gasoline available conveniently, but has to drive across town for E85 or other biofuels that might work in his/her car, which option do you suppose s/he'll choose? Yeah, exactly... UCS notes "More than a decade after the program was introduced, government data showed that dual-fuel vehicles used an alternative fuel less than one percent of the time."
So, what have we got here? Let's do it Register Editorial Board style:

1. Detroit automakers are pushing FFVs in order to dodge CAFE standards so they can sell more gas-guzzling pickup trucks and SUVs.

2. E85 is impossible to find and expensive.

3. Vilsack want to spend at least $180 million in taxpayer money to have more E85 pumps installed.

4. But ethanol is so expensive now, thanks to California, New York, a slew of other states phasing out MTBE in favor of ethanol as an oxygenate additive, that E10 costs more than 100% regular old unleaded gas in Iowa.

5. And E85, if it were priced in comparison to 100% gasoline's efficiency, disregarding all the tax breaks ethanol gets, would cost well over $4 a gallon.

6. Nobody in their right mind is going to buy that stuff, except maybe government vehicles.

Now That Ken Lay Is Dead



What do you want to bet that the Des Moines Register will be kicking Ken Lay all the time now that he has died?

They'll probably have Rekha or Rekha disguised as the Register Editorial Board complaining about how justice wasn't served because Lay died at his home in Aspen, CO rather than rotting in some Federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.

They'll talk once again about the billions lost in Enron employee 401K plans, while failing to mention that Gannett, owner of the Des Moines Register, used to employ a similar 401K matching plan. Actually, the Gannett plan was even worse than Enron's because Gannett's had fewer investment options.

Nicholas Johnson's FromDC2Iowa Blog

UI Professor of Law and former FCC Commissioner Nicholas Johnson now has a conventional blog, FromDC2Iowa.


(h/t: Side Notes)

Chet Atkins vs Culver's Butter Burgers

Chet "Atkins" all svelte a few years ago:




And here's Chet after a few too many stops at Culver's Butter Burgers:




What happened?

1. More Bitchy List From The Wedgie Board



The Register Editorial Board takes a rather lame shot at Rep. Steve "The Combover" King and his preposterous statement that Iraq is more safer than Washington DC.

The truth is that Baghdad has a lot of violent deaths, but Iraq as a whole has a lower violent death rate than countries like Columbia, Sueth Africa, and Jamaica, mon.

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

Tom Vilsack Failed Math Class



State 29 blog on January 11, 2006: Vilsack Wants 6.1% Increase In Spending

Des Moines Register headline on July 4, 2006: State revenue went up by 3.6% in budget year

Monday, July 03, 2006

Fireworks Are Banned In Iowa



Down here in almost-Brownback country, the locals allow some fireworks but ban things like bottle rockets.

Drive over the border into Missouri and you can buy almost anything.

In Iowa, fireworks have been banned for a long time. It started back in the early 1930s when most of downtown Spencer burned down:
On June 27, 1931, a sparkler dropped in a drugstore fireworks display started the devastating Spencer fire that destroyed 50 downtown stores. Buildings were blasted with dynamite to create a fire barrier, but not before there was $2,000,000.00 damage. Within a year, in the midst of a major depression, every building had been rebuilt and Mainstreet had been repaired and repaved.
Iowa does allow a few things like sparklers, snakes, and certain kinds of poppers, but that's about it.

Sunday, July 02, 2006

The Register Editorial Board Has A Seizure

The Register Editorial Board offers up a hysterical op-ed in Sunday's paper under the title of Restore rights lost to war on terrorism. Here's a funny one:
4. So far, we know the Bush administration has been tapping international telephone calls, seizing telephone records of millions of Americans and, most recently, secretly examining records of global banking transactions. But has it stopped there? Each time a new privacy breach is revealed, administration lawyers confidently assert that they have exhaustively researched the law and concluded it's all perfectly legal. We therefore must assume the administration believes it has the unilateral power to search virtually anything without the express approval of Congress or the courts.

Seizing???

Does the Des Moines Register stand by that word seizing?

This is from the AP today, concerning the Register's step-aunt publication, USA Today (both papers are owned by Gannett):
The newspaper reported Friday that lawmakers on congressional intelligence committees have said that while the NSA has amassed a huge database of calling records, cooperation with the NSA by telephone companies was not as extensive as USA Today said May 11, when it reported that, according to its sources, AT&T, BellSouth and Verizon all agreed to provide the agency with domestic call records.

The newspaper said Friday that Verizon and BellSouth deny they contracted to provide the NSA with records of customers' calls. AT&T has neither confirmed nor denied the report.

Whoops!

So the Bush Administration didn't seize anything.

In fact, USA Today's story is full of holes.

Or shit.

Or both.

Meanwhile, may I remind you all of the words written last year by super-sized Register sports columnist Nancy Clark concerning the mainstream media and bloggers:
Know that if the information is coming from the mainstream media - the accredited reporters, broadcasters and photojournalists - they are following strict professional guidelines that the looser outlets don't require. The information has been verified, has been scrutinized by editors, has been fact-checked and proofed.

Back to the editorial at-hand.

I thought the numbering of each paragraph was funny, as if they had some sort of laundry list of complaints. But it doesn't read like a list of complaints. It really reads like some skewed trajectory within the mind of a 1. wholly consumed, 2. Bush-hating, 3. terrorist-appeasing, 4. lefty 5. moron 6. who's trying to articulate some wacky conspiracy.

Kind of sounds like somebody at the Register is having a seizure, more or less.

Vote For Miss Hoosegow Honey 2006

Update: Welcum "sloppy seconds" visitors from Instapundit via Iowahawk!


From Iowahawk:
When I first started posting the comely mugshots of selected arrestees from Des Moines' Polk County Jail (h/t State 29), I had no idea so many readers shared my fascination with caged pulchritude. To commemorate the anniversary of this popular feature, I think it's finally time to select the official Hawkeye Hoosegow Honey of the Year.

But make no mistake: this will not be a beauty-only pageant. It is important that the winner be well-rounded, and that is why I have added a talent portion to the program. In addition to the raw votes she receives from readers, each candidate will receive 1 bonus point for every $100 in bond set by her assigned magistrate.

So please review the cavalcade of incarcerated corn country cuties, and vote for the one that sets your heart a-twitter. If you'd like more information on the candidates, Google "Hoosegow Honey" or simply rifle through the archives. Voting closes Friday July 7. Good luck, and may the best gal win!

Vote here.

My pick, Tammi:


For a while I tried to get the term CILF going (Criminal I'd Like To F...), but Hoosegow Honey is all right.

Saturday, July 01, 2006

E10 Price Rise Finally Noted In The Des Moines Register

Anne Fitzgerald writes an extremely dumb piece in the Des Moines Register on why the price of E10 (gasohol) is now a dime or more a gallon above regular old 100% unleaded gasoline.

By dumb I mean that she surely knows the reason why E10 now costs more than normal gasoline, but it takes her until the sixth paragraph to skirt the issue:
Energy market analysts say various factors have driven E10 prices higher, including a federal mandate requiring increased use of ethanol and soaring demand for the renewable fuel, particularly from more populous areas on the East and West coasts.
That's it.

Nothing specifically about how California, Connecticut, Maryland, New York, and other states have phased out MTBE and now have to use ethanol as an oxygenate additive, thus driving up demand and the price.

The reporter then goes to the usual suspects: a corn farmer, an oil analyst, somebody from a trade association, and some flunky from the Iowa Corn Promotion Board.

Not only is the Register late with this story, but they can't even be bothered to properly explain why the price of ethanol is going up. Instead, they run to all the special interest groups who are trying to cheerlead the public into buying their more expensive blended fuel.

Why?

The Register knows that the fallout from high ethanol prices might kill Vilsack's plan to spend $180 million in Iowa taxpayer dollars to equip stations around the state with tanks and pumps to sell $4+ a gallon E85, a fuel that reduces automobile mileage by 30%.

I think I can predict where this is going:

Participation in buying E10 will go from 70% to maybe 10%, probably overnight. Most people are just going to buy the cheapest fuel.

The special interests and farmers will whine about how the lack of customers for more-expensive E10 will hurt them, which is bogus.

You already see outright lies being printed, like this oil analyst:
Some analysts believe investors who have been pouring millions of dollars into new and expanding ethanol plants have contributed to elevated prices.

"There is just so much money going into it, that it is causing the price to go higher,'' said Glen Falk, retail pricing manager for the Oil Price Information Service in Wall, N.J. "It's speculation."
That's just bullshit talk and he knows it. The Register, on the other hand, might not know it's bullshit because the place is crawling with stupid Socialists.

Expect your local television news people to crank out more of these stories. They're usually the dumbest of the dumb and never explain an issue except in the most superficial of ways.

I can't wait for Tom Vilsack and Tom Harkin to come out and whine about "price gouging" and "windfall profits" by ethanol companies.


Related: E-85-ing Around The Midwest: "The Price Was Ugly"